Cross-domain evidence graph
Observatory atlas
Follow documented connections between markets, firms, places, publications, and sources. A connection shows a recorded relationship, not that two measures describe the same market.
More atlas tools4 exact routes
Current focusCourt finds Google liabl...19,193 records / 27 family pairs
Graph census · All declared links
Who the Atlas connects
Every lane is an exact family-pair contract in the active semantic lens, ranked by encoded edge count.13 of 13families connectedTop 8 routes carry 97.2% of active-layer edges.
- Active-lens edges
- 19,193
- All declared links
- Family-pair routes
- 27
- exact family contracts
- Cross-family pairs
- 24
- between unlike families
- Self-family pairs
- 3
- within one family
- 01PlacesIndicatorsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier6,41233.4%
- 02PlacesSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier3,37817.6%
- 03PlacesPlacesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier3,20416.7%
- 04IndustriesSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier1,95410.2%
- 05IndustriesIndustriesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier1,8499.6%
- 06IndustriesIndicatorsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier1,5768.2%
- 07PublicationsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier1690.9%
- 08PlacesPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier1140.6%
Inspect the remaining 19 family-pair routes537 links · 2.8% of active-layer edges
- 09TopicsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier970.5%
- 10TopicsQuestionsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier580.3%
- 11MarketsProductsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier550.3%
- 12IndicatorsSourcesMeasurement + Research layer · open complete contract dossier500.3%
- 13QuestionsIndicatorsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier460.2%
- 14MarketsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier330.2%
- 15RecordsNamed entitiesEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier310.2%
- 16ProductsOperatorsOrganization layer · open complete contract dossier280.1%
- 17MarketsIndicatorsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier210.1%
- 18MarketsSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier200.1%
- 19MarketsRecordsEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier18<0.1%
- 20IndustriesPlacesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier17<0.1%
- 21IssuesTopicsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier16<0.1%
- 22RecordsSourcesEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier14<0.1%
- 23MarketsIndustriesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier12<0.1%
- 24MarketsIssuesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier12<0.1%
- 25OperatorsNamed entitiesOrganization layer · open complete contract dossier4<0.1%
- 26SourcesSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier3<0.1%
- 27ProductsNamed entitiesOrganization layer · open complete contract dossier2<0.1%
Choose one exact semantic contract to rebuild the topology, neighborhood, diagnostics, ledger, and public exports around only that declared edge type.
Focused evidence graph
Court finds Google liabl...
35 connected nodes in this bounded slice- Visible nodes
- 35
- of 35
- Visible edges
- 67
- declared links
- Direct links
- 4
- from focus
- Hidden nodes
- 0
- plot cap only
- Official stage
- decision
- Status
- decision
- Declared links
- 4
- Latest year
- 2024
The district court issued a liability opinion finding that Google maintained monopolies in general search services and general search text advertising in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
Open canonical profileNo indicator row is keyed directly to this profile. These analytical contexts are one declared graph hop away.
Direct relationship fingerprint
How Court finds Google liabl... is declared in the Atlas
- Counterparties
- 4
- Unique canonical endpoints
- Encoded links
- 4
- Exact focus edges
- Source custody
- 100%
- 4 source-bearing links
- Profile families
- 3
- Direct counterparty types
Relationship ledger
Every plotted line remains an inspectable record
67 edges survive the current focus, depth, node-type, layer, and semantic-type contract.
The official case record identifies Google LLC as the defendant.
The liability decision belongs to the federal case naming Google LLC as defendant.
The official remedy record identifies Google as subject to the ordered search remedies.
Starts the federal case chronology for the default and distribution channels connected to the search and browser profiles; it is legal context rather than a concentration observation.
Starts the federal case chronology for the default and distribution channels connected to the search and browser profiles; it is legal context rather than a concentration observation.
Marks the liability decision before the remedies phase. The ruling does not by itself establish a change in the observatory's usage-share HHI series.
Marks the liability decision before the remedies phase. The ruling does not by itself establish a change in the observatory's usage-share HHI series.
The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.
The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.
U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC [2020] is the custody record encoded for this dated policy event.
U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC [2020] is the custody record encoded for this dated policy event.
CR4 is the sum of the four largest sourced non-aggregate participant shares in this released anchor.
Showing 8 of 67 exact relationships. The complete filtered ledger remains available in CSV.
55 additional exact edges are available in JSON and CSV.
Graph contract
Relationship families stay separate
The atlas joins routes through encoded custody and context, never through name resemblance or an inferred corporate, legal, or causal relationship.
The atlas exposes only relationships declared in the current public data. A link or issue grouping does not make unlike measures comparable, establish ownership or control, define an antitrust market, assign liability, or show that a policy event caused an economic outcome.
Reusable graph packet
Carry node and edge custody into analysis
The packet preserves node type, canonical route, relationship family, source link, evidence label, confidence, and edge-specific guardrail.