Skip to main content
Relationship census

Atlas contract 10 of 27

Topics to Questions

58 exact declared relationships connect 6 research topics with 46 research questions.
Declared edges
58
0.3% of Atlas
Endpoint profiles
52
unique nodes
Source-linked
0.0%
0 custody routes
Composite score
None
counts stay separate
Relationship contractA family-pair edge records the declaration named in its row. Volume, hub position, and adjacency do not establish importance, ownership, substitutability, control, liability, causation, or antitrust harm.Evidence standard

Contract composition

What these edges actually encode

1 relationship type · 1 active layer

Relationship types

  1. 01
    Declared agenda membershiptopic question · research layer
    58100.0%

Layer composition

Research58 100.0%

Confidence labels

Bounded58 100.0%

Type-specific limit: A topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.

Endpoint coverage

Which profiles carry this contract

Ranked by incident edges inside this pair, never by importance or market power.

Topics

6 connected profiles
  1. 01Industry StructurePublication memberships: 41729.3%
  2. 02Market StructurePublication memberships: 91525.9%
  3. 03Digital PlatformsPublication memberships: 21220.7%
  4. 04Business DynamismPublication memberships: 2610.3%
  5. 05Geographic CompetitionPublication memberships: 7610.3%
  6. 06Merger ReviewPublication memberships: 323.4%

Questions

46 connected profiles
  1. 01Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 3,61223.4%
  2. 02Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 5,33723.4%
  3. 03Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 7,35923.4%
  4. 04Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 4,99523.4%
  5. 05Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 93.8%23.4%
  6. 06Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 100.0%23.4%
  7. 07Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 99.4%23.4%
  8. 08Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 94.4%23.4%
  9. 09Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 50.0%23.4%
  10. 10Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 63.1%23.4%
  11. 11Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 85.2%23.4%
  12. 12Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 68.9%23.4%
34 additional connected profiles remain in the exact relationship register.

Source custody

Where the pair declarations come from

0 of 58 edges carry a registered source profile or external evidence URL.
Source-linked edges
0
0.0% of pair
Custody routes
0
deduplicated records or URLs
Without source URL
58
declared editorial or crosswalk contracts

This pair is an explicitly declared editorial or bounded crosswalk contract and does not currently carry a row-level public source URL. That absence is visible here and does not become source evidence by implication.

Exact relationship register

Inspect every declared edge

58 matching rows · page 1 of 3
RelationshipTopicsQuestionsLayer / confidenceEvidence custody
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionBusiness DynamismPublication memberships: 2How much of the change in net job creation comes from gross creation versus destruction, and which sectors or firm-age groups drive it?Net job creation rate: 2.5%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionBusiness DynamismPublication memberships: 2Which closing and contracting establishments, sectors, places, or firm-age groups account for the change in gross job destruction?Job destruction rate: 11.1%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionBusiness DynamismPublication memberships: 2Which opening and expanding establishments, sectors, places, or firm-age groups account for the change in gross job creation?Job creation rate: 13.6%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionBusiness DynamismPublication memberships: 2Which sectors, firm-age groups, places, closures, or ownership transitions account for the latest national exit-rate movement?Establishment exit rate: 9.4%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionBusiness DynamismPublication memberships: 2Which sectors, firm-age groups, places, financing conditions, or policy changes account for the latest national entry-rate movement?Establishment entry rate: 10.6%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionBusiness DynamismPublication memberships: 2Which sectors, places, and firm-age groups account for the movement in excess job reallocation, and what entry or exit mechanisms merit study?Excess job reallocation rate: 22.1%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 3,612researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 5,337researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 7,359researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: 4,995researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 93.8%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 100.0%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 99.4%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio: 94.4%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 50.0%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 63.1%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 85.2%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionDigital PlatformsPublication memberships: 2Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Leading-participant share: 68.9%researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionGeographic CompetitionPublication memberships: 7How can the nearly stable national aggregate be reconciled with state-level movement, organization turnover, branch change, and nominal deposit growth?National bank-deposit HHI: 401researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionGeographic CompetitionPublication memberships: 7What provider-share, technology, speed-tier, entry, and geographic composition changes explain the rise in national HHI while median subnational HHIs declined?Residential fixed broadband National HHI: 1,501researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionGeographic CompetitionPublication memberships: 7Which areas and provider-share changes account for movement in the county median, and how wide is the distribution hidden by the median?Residential fixed broadband County median: 4,599researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionGeographic CompetitionPublication memberships: 7Which areas and provider-share changes account for movement in the state median, and how wide is the distribution hidden by the median?Residential fixed broadband State median: 2,937researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionGeographic CompetitionPublication memberships: 7Which areas and provider-share changes account for movement in the tract median, and how wide is the distribution hidden by the median?Residential fixed broadband Tract median: 5,504researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionGeographic CompetitionPublication memberships: 7Which state-specific paths, ownership-reporting changes, branch-booking patterns, entry, exit, or consolidation events account for movement beneath the cross-sectional median?Median statewide bank-deposit HHI: 903researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.
Declared agenda membershiptopic questionIndustry StructurePublication memberships: 4Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?Median detailed-industry HHI: 391researchbounded confidenceResearch topic agenda contractA topic-to-question link records one exact institutional agenda membership; it does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, or imply a shared finding.