Antitrust Radar
Enforcement atlas

Economic observatory / official records

Compare official enforcement records

Compare dated official records, procedural stages, and named organizations. Allegations, decisions, remedies, and available economic evidence remain distinct.

Official records
142019-2026
Named edges
31source-backed relationships
Market contexts
7exact linked profiles
Source records
13public custody routes

Comparison standard. Records can share an organization, market, source, docket, or agency without sharing legal posture or effect. No cross-record score is calculated.

HHI windows are descriptive, never causal.

Official record comparison

Assemble an exact public-record cohort

Select two to four records. Selection order is preserved in the comparison and its public data packets.
3/4 selected

Official record field

Selected actions inside the full chronology

2019-202614 public records
All official records appear as context points by date and procedural stage. Selected records are numbered and colored by stage. Position does not imply importance or legal effect.FTC announces proposed consent agreement with CaremarkFTC announces proposed consent agreement with Express ScriptsDOJ files proposed settlement with RealPage03Court orders search distribution and data-access remediesFTC reports on cloud-provider and generative AI partnershipsFCC releases 2024 Communications Marketplace ReportDOJ and DOT launch broad inquiry into competition in air travelFTC files administrative complaint against the three largest PBMsDOJ and states sue RealPage over rental pricing practices02Court finds Google liable for unlawful search monopoly maintenanceFTC releases interim staff report on prescription drug middlemenCourt blocks JetBlue's proposed acquisition of Spirit Airlines01United States files search monopolization complaint against GoogleT-Mobile-Sprint settlement requires divestitures to support wireless entry
01LitigationOct 20, 202002DecisionAug 5, 202403RemedySep 2, 2025
Named edges
31 unique organizations
Market contexts
3exact linked IDs
Source records
2custody remains separate
HHI windows
74 paired

Evidence contracts

Keep procedural meaning and evidence custody separate

3 selected records
Selected official enforcement records compared across identity, named organizations, market context, HHI-window availability, and source custody.
Official recordContractNamed organizationsMarket contextHHI windowsSource custody
01United States files search monopolization complaint against GoogleU.S. Department of JusticeLitigationcomplaint / Oct 20, 2020No docket encoded11 named roleDefendant2Search engines / BrowsersObservatory context, not an adjudicated boundary22 one-sidedDescriptive public releases onlyU.S. Department of JusticeU.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC [2020]Accessed Jul 17, 2026
02Court finds Google liable for unlawful search monopoly maintenanceU.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaDecisiondecision / Aug 5, 2024No docket encoded11 named roleDefendant2Search engines / BrowsersObservatory context, not an adjudicated boundary22 pairedDescriptive public releases onlyU.S. Department of JusticeU.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC [2020]Accessed Jul 17, 2026
03Court orders search distribution and data-access remediesU.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaRemedyremedy / Sep 2, 2025No docket encoded11 named roleRemedy subject3Search engines / Browsers / AI assistantsObservatory context, not an adjudicated boundary32 paired / 1 one-sidedDescriptive public releases onlyU.S. Department of JusticeDepartment of Justice Wins Significant Remedies Against GoogleAccessed Jul 17, 2026

Interpretation boundary. This studio compares exact public-record contracts, named relationships, market context, and descriptive HHI-window availability. It does not rank enforcement actions, equate procedural stages, convert allegations into findings, or estimate causal effects.