Report subject
Alphabet, Inc.Cloud service provider named in the FTC AI partnerships and investments study.
Source-specific evidence
The FTC report identifies Alphabet among the cloud service providers studied.
The FTC published findings from its Section 6(b) study of investments and partnerships involving Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Anthropic, and OpenAI.
Adds upstream cloud, input-access, switching-cost, and information-sharing context to the AI usage-share profile; the report studies a broader competitive layer than chatbot usage.
Exact named-organization edges
Report subject
Alphabet, Inc.Cloud service provider named in the FTC AI partnerships and investments study.
Source-specific evidence
The FTC report identifies Alphabet among the cloud service providers studied.
Report subject
Amazon.com, Inc.Cloud service provider named in the FTC AI partnerships and investments study.
Source-specific evidence
The FTC report identifies Amazon among the cloud service providers studied.
Report subject
Anthropic PBCGenerative AI developer named in the FTC AI partnerships and investments study.
Source-specific evidence
The FTC report identifies Anthropic among the generative AI developers studied.
Report subject
Microsoft, Corp.Cloud service provider named in the FTC AI partnerships and investments study.
Source-specific evidence
The FTC report identifies Microsoft among the cloud service providers studied.
Report subject
OpenAI OpCo, LLCGenerative AI developer named in the FTC AI partnerships and investments study.
Source-specific evidence
The FTC report identifies OpenAI among the generative AI developers studied.
A relationship means an official source names the organization in connection with the dated record. It does not by itself establish liability, market power, ownership, control, or that the organization participates in every market linked to that record.
Descriptive economic context
Each row searches one linked market profile for strict pre-event, same-year, and strict post-event observations. Missing anchors remain part of the result.
Before/after HHI differences are descriptive comparisons between discrete public releases. They do not estimate the causal effect of the policy event.
Bounded market context
United States / Digital platforms
Post-event onlyConsumer generative AI assistant usage concentration from StatCounter Global Stats for May 2026. The market tracks which AI chatbots people use across StatCounter-tracked assistants, an observed usage-share proxy rather than revenue, total user counts, or the broader AI supply chain of chips and cloud.
A linked market identifies the observatory context assigned to this record. It is not necessarily the relevant antitrust market alleged or adjudicated in the official matter.
Source custody
Federal Trade Commission / agency report
FTC staff report on cloud-provider investments in and partnerships with major generative AI developers.
Accessed Jul 17, 2026. Federal Trade Commission, FTC Issues Staff Report on AI Partnerships and Investments Study, January 17 2025.
License note: Public federal government report
Nearby observatory chronology
Explicit proceeding membership / record 1 of 1
Open the declared chronology before using market-linked nearby records as broader context.
Sep 2, 2025
RemedyU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Court orders search distribution and data-access remediesShared context: AI assistants
This chronology is generated from shared observatory market links. It does not assert that the records concern the same matter, conduct, parties, or theory of harm.
Reproducible record packet
Filtered routes preserve the exact event ID across the official record, named-organization edges, descriptive market windows, and linked market profiles.
A record dossier preserves what one dated official source says and the observatory context linked to it. It does not convert allegations into findings, findings into economy-wide conclusions, or nearby market indicators into causal effects.
A linked market identifies the observatory context assigned to this record. It is not necessarily the relevant antitrust market alleged or adjudicated in the official matter.