Remedy subject
Google LLCTechnology company named as the defendant in the federal search monopolization case.
Source-specific evidence
The official remedy record identifies Google as subject to the ordered search remedies.
The court prohibited specified exclusive distribution contracts and ordered access to certain search index and user-interaction data plus search and text-ad syndication services.
The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.
Exact named-organization edges
Remedy subject
Google LLCTechnology company named as the defendant in the federal search monopolization case.
Source-specific evidence
The official remedy record identifies Google as subject to the ordered search remedies.
A relationship means an official source names the organization in connection with the dated record. It does not by itself establish liability, market power, ownership, control, or that the organization participates in every market linked to that record.
Descriptive economic context
Each row searches one linked market profile for strict pre-event, same-year, and strict post-event observations. Missing anchors remain part of the result.
Before/after HHI differences are descriptive comparisons between discrete public releases. They do not estimate the causal effect of the policy event.
Bounded market context
United States / Digital platforms
Paired windowAll-platform U.S. search engine usage share from StatCounter Global Stats for April 2026. The market is an observed usage-share proxy, not search advertising revenue.
United States / Software
Paired windowAll-platform U.S. browser usage share from StatCounter Global Stats for April 2026. The profile tracks browser usage concentration, not browser advertising or operating-system tying questions.
United States / Digital platforms
Post-event onlyConsumer generative AI assistant usage concentration from StatCounter Global Stats for May 2026. The market tracks which AI chatbots people use across StatCounter-tracked assistants, an observed usage-share proxy rather than revenue, total user counts, or the broader AI supply chain of chips and cloud.
A linked market identifies the observatory context assigned to this record. It is not necessarily the relevant antitrust market alleged or adjudicated in the official matter.
Source custody
U.S. Department of Justice / agency report
DOJ record summarizing court remedies addressing search distribution contracts data access syndication Chrome and Gemini.
Accessed Jul 17, 2026. U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Justice Wins Significant Remedies Against Google, September 2 2025.
License note: Public federal government record
Nearby observatory chronology
Explicit proceeding membership / record 3 of 3
Open the declared chronology before using market-linked nearby records as broader context.
Jan 17, 2025
MonitoringFederal Trade Commission
FTC reports on cloud-provider and generative AI partnershipsShared context: AI assistants
Aug 5, 2024
DecisionU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Court finds Google liable for unlawful search monopoly maintenanceShared context: Search engines / Browsers
Oct 20, 2020
LitigationU.S. Department of Justice
United States files search monopolization complaint against GoogleShared context: Search engines / Browsers
This chronology is generated from shared observatory market links. It does not assert that the records concern the same matter, conduct, parties, or theory of harm.
Reproducible record packet
Filtered routes preserve the exact event ID across the official record, named-organization edges, descriptive market windows, and linked market profiles.
A record dossier preserves what one dated official source says and the observatory context linked to it. It does not convert allegations into findings, findings into economy-wide conclusions, or nearby market indicators into causal effects.
A linked market identifies the observatory context assigned to this record. It is not necessarily the relevant antitrust market alleged or adjudicated in the official matter.