The federal search case from complaint through liability and the currently encoded remedies order, linked to separately bounded search, browser, and AI usage evidence.
Grouping basisThe complaint, liability decision, and remedies order are grouped because the official records belong to the same federal search monopolization case.
DOJ and state plaintiffs filed a civil case challenging Google's maintenance of monopolies in general search services and search advertising through distribution agreements.
Starts the federal case chronology for the default and distribution channels connected to the search and browser profiles; it is legal context rather than a concentration observation.
The district court issued a liability opinion finding that Google maintained monopolies in general search services and general search text advertising in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
Marks the liability decision before the remedies phase. The ruling does not by itself establish a change in the observatory's usage-share HHI series.
The court prohibited specified exclusive distribution contracts and ordered access to certain search index and user-interaction data plus search and text-ad syndication services.
The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.
A market link is observatory context assigned to an official record. It is not necessarily the relevant antitrust market alleged or adjudicated in the proceeding.
These are descriptive observations from separately defined market series. Timing does not identify the proceeding's effect, and missing HHI remains missing.
Shared observatory context does not establish that two proceedings concern the same conduct, parties, legal theory, market, or effect.
Reproducible proceeding packet
Reuse the chronology without flattening its evidence
Every route keeps the exact event IDs selected for this proceeding. Record rows, named-organization edges, market windows, and Atlas relationships remain separate tables.
Proceeding ID
proceeding-google-search
Profile slug
google-search-monopolization
Docket set
Not encoded
License
CC BY 4.0 compilation
Proceeding interpretation boundary
The complaint, liability decision, and remedies order are grouped because the official records belong to the same federal search monopolization case. The latest encoded stage is a data-coverage statement, not a conclusion about current posture or finality.