Skip to main content

Cross-domain evidence graph

Observatory atlas

Follow documented connections between markets, firms, places, publications, and sources. A connection shows a recorded relationship, not that two measures describe the same market.

Live family topologyEnforcement

Current focusCourt orders search dist...63 records / 3 family pairs

Enforcement topology centered on Court orders search dist...Line width represents declared relationship count. Line color identifies relationship layer. Circle size represents the number of canonical profiles in each family.Records to Named entities: 31 declared links. Enforcement 31.Markets to Records: 18 declared links. Enforcement 18.Records to Sources: 14 declared links. Enforcement 14.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 18 links in Enforcement, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1,866Industries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3,270Places: 3,270 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 63 links in Enforcement, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 31 links in Enforcement, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 14 links in Enforcement, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Enforcement compact topology centered on Court orders search dist...Tap a family or weighted route to inspect its declared neighborhood, then use the dossier action below to open the complete record. Circle size represents canonical profile count.Records to Named entities: 31 declared links. Enforcement 31.Markets to Records: 18 declared links. Enforcement 18.Records to Sources: 14 declared links. Enforcement 14.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 18 links in Enforcement, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1.9kIndustries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3.3kPlaces: 3,270 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 63 links in Enforcement, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 31 links in Enforcement, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 0 links in Enforcement, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 14 links in Enforcement, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Canonical nodes5,4785433 public profiles
Declared edges19,193exact encoded links
Node families13bounded domains
Inferred links0name-only joins
Encoded hereProfile-to-indicator observations, issue-program scope, source custody, market participation, official attribution, declared industry context, publication scope, and dated policy relationships.
Never inferred hereSubstitutability, ownership, control, liability, causation, or comparability across unlike measures.
Read evidence standard

Graph census · Enforcement

Who the Atlas connects

Every lane is an exact family-pair contract in the active semantic lens, ranked by encoded edge count.

4 of 13families connectedTop 3 routes carry 100.0% of active-layer edges.

Active-lens edges
63
Enforcement
Family-pair routes
3
exact family contracts
Cross-family pairs
3
between unlike families
Self-family pairs
0
within one family
Open the complete relationship matrixScan all 91 possible family contracts by edge volume or source custody, including explicit structural zeros.
  1. 01RecordsNamed entitiesEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier3149.2%
  2. 02MarketsRecordsEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier1828.6%
  3. 03RecordsSourcesEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier1422.2%
Bar length uses a logarithmic scale so low-volume lanes remain visible.Counts and shares describe encoded relationships, not economic importance, substitutability, control, liability, or antitrust harm.

Graph query

Build a declared relationship neighborhood

Network depth
RecordsCourt orders search distribution and data-access remediesEnforcement / 2 hops / all neighbors
Semantic classificationAll 39 relationship contracts remain distinctRead ontology

Choose one exact semantic contract to rebuild the topology, neighborhood, diagnostics, ledger, and public exports around only that declared edge type.

Focused evidence graph

Court orders search dist...

9 connected nodes in this bounded slice
Visible nodes
9
of 9
Visible edges
12
declared links
Direct links
5
from focus
Hidden nodes
0
plot cap only
Direct neighborhood5
Markets12Products55Operators20Industries1866Issues6Topics8Questions46Places3270Indicators30Records14Named entities21Publications85Sources45
RecordsCourt orders search distribution and data-access remediesU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia / 2025-09-02
Official stage
remedy
Status
remedy
Declared links
5
Latest year
2025

The court prohibited specified exclusive distribution contracts and ordered access to certain search index and user-interaction data plus search and text-ad syndication services.

Open canonical profile
Analysis handoff3

No indicator row is keyed directly to this profile. These analytical contexts are one declared graph hop away.

Direct relationships5

Direct relationship fingerprint

How Court orders search dist... is declared in the Atlas

Enforcement / direct focus links / no composite score
Counterparties
5
Unique canonical endpoints
Encoded links
5
Exact focus edges
Source custody
100%
5 source-bearing links
Profile families
3
Direct counterparty types
Counterparty compositionDirect nodes by profile family
Unique endpoints / active layer
Markets3 encoded edges
3
Named entities1 encoded edge
1
Sources1 encoded edge
1
Declared counterpartiesCarry exact endpoints into deeper analysis
5 available
01
1 edge1 source-bearing
02
1 edge1 source-bearing
03
1 edge1 source-bearing
04
1 edge1 source-bearing
05
1 edge1 source-bearing
Direct layer mixMeasurement0Organization0Enforcement5Research0
Encoded confidencehigh1medium0bounded4low0

Relationship ledger

Every plotted line remains an inspectable record

12 edges survive the current focus, depth, node-type, layer, and semantic-type contract.

Enforcementdefendantnamed in record

The official case record identifies Google LLC as the defendant.

Exact official-record relationshipboundedSource
Enforcementdefendantnamed in record

The liability decision belongs to the federal case naming Google LLC as defendant.

Exact official-record relationshipboundedSource
Enforcementremedy subjectnamed in record

The official remedy record identifies Google as subject to the ordered search remedies.

Exact official-record relationshipboundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

Adds upstream cloud, input-access, switching-cost, and information-sharing context to the AI usage-share profile; the report studies a broader competitive layer than chatbot usage.

Federal Trade Commission / 2025-01-17boundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

Starts the federal case chronology for the default and distribution channels connected to the search and browser profiles; it is legal context rather than a concentration observation.

U.S. Department of Justice / 2020-10-20boundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

Starts the federal case chronology for the default and distribution channels connected to the search and browser profiles; it is legal context rather than a concentration observation.

U.S. Department of Justice / 2020-10-20boundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

Marks the liability decision before the remedies phase. The ruling does not by itself establish a change in the observatory's usage-share HHI series.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia / 2024-08-05boundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

Marks the liability decision before the remedies phase. The ruling does not by itself establish a change in the observatory's usage-share HHI series.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia / 2024-08-05boundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia / 2025-09-02boundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia / 2025-09-02boundedSource
EnforcementRelated policy contextpolicy scope

The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia / 2025-09-02boundedSource
EnforcementOfficial record sourcerecord source

Department of Justice Wins Significant Remedies Against Google is the custody record encoded for this dated policy event.

U.S. Department of JusticehighSource

Showing 8 of 12 exact relationships. The complete filtered ledger remains available in CSV.

Graph contract

Relationship families stay separate

The atlas joins routes through encoded custody and context, never through name resemblance or an inferred corporate, legal, or causal relationship.

The atlas exposes only relationships declared in the current public data. A link or issue grouping does not make unlike measures comparable, establish ownership or control, define an antitrust market, assign liability, or show that a policy event caused an economic outcome.

Reusable graph packet

Carry node and edge custody into analysis

The packet preserves node type, canonical route, relationship family, source link, evidence label, confidence, and edge-specific guardrail.