Skip to main content

Relationship ontology / Declared scope

Type 11 of 39

Research question membership in topic

Connects an institutional research topic to each public agenda question included by its exact domain or entity membership contract.

Directed family contractsResearch
Institutional research topic to public agenda question1 exact contract
Declared edges
58
0.3% of graph
Profile nodes
52
distinct endpoints
Family contracts
1
endpoint pairings
Source custody
0.0%
0 links
Label variants
1
encoded evidence labels
This edge recordsConnects an institutional research topic to each public agenda question included by its exact domain or entity membership contract.
This edge does not establishInstitutional agenda membership does not rank urgency, importance, evidence strength, research merit, or imply a shared finding.

Canonical contract

Read the edge before reading the network

The type definition is stable across every edge in this dossier.
Semantic category
Declared scope
Curated topic, issue-program, market, publication, and policy-context boundaries.
Declared layer
Research
Topic, question, and issue scope, publication routes, source custody, and contextual references
Direction
Institutional research topic to public agenda question
Direction describes the encoded record, not economic influence.
Evidence basis
The stable agenda-domain and agenda-entity identifiers declared in the published research-topic definition.
Edge-specific evidence remains visible in the ledger below.

Type composition

Where this semantic contract appears

Family routes, evidence labels, confidence, and custody remain separate dimensions.
Family contracts1

Endpoint structure

  1. Topics to QuestionsTopics to Questions58
Evidence labels1

Published edge wording

  1. Declared agenda membership100.0% of type58
Confidence contract1

Declared confidence labels

  1. Bounded100.0% of type58
0.0%0 of 58 edges carry direct source custody

Endpoint incidence

Profiles carrying this relationship type

Counts describe incident edges only. They do not rank economic importance or influence.
Encoded origin6 profiles

Most frequent from-endpoints

  1. 01Industry Structuretopic17
  2. 02Market Structuretopic15
  3. 03Digital Platformstopic12
  4. 04Business Dynamismtopic6
  5. 05Geographic Competitiontopic6
  6. 06Merger Reviewtopic2
Encoded destination46 profiles

Most frequent to-endpoints

  1. 01Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question2
  2. 02Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question2
  3. 03Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question2
  4. 04Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question2
  5. 05Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question2
  6. 06Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question2
  7. 07Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question2
  8. 08Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question2
  9. 09Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question2
  10. 10Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question2

Source custody

Evidence routes attached to this type

Source counts describe direct custody encoded on these edges.

0source routes0.0% edge coverage

No direct source route is encoded on this relationship type.Its endpoints may have separate source custody, but that does not become custody for this edge.

Exact edge register

Inspect every encoded instance

Search retains the canonical type while matching endpoint labels, evidence wording, source IDs, and edge details.

58matching edgespage 3 of 3

From profileEncoded relationshipTo profileEvidence custody
Market StructuretopicDeclared agenda membershipQ41, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.topic-question:market-structure:market-cr4:us-social-media-referral-trafficWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route
Market StructuretopicDeclared agenda membershipQ30, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.topic-question:market-structure:market-cr4:us-steer-heifer-meatpacking-purchasesWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route
Market StructuretopicDeclared agenda membershipQ33, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.topic-question:market-structure:market-leader-share:us-browser-usageWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route
Market StructuretopicDeclared agenda membershipQ37, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.topic-question:market-structure:market-leader-share:us-mobile-operating-system-usageWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route
Market StructuretopicDeclared agenda membershipQ40, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.topic-question:market-structure:market-leader-share:us-search-engine-usageWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route
Market StructuretopicDeclared agenda membershipQ43, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.topic-question:market-structure:market-leader-share:us-social-media-referral-trafficWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route
Merger ReviewtopicDeclared agenda membershipQ46, How did filing mix, transaction size, thresholds, exemptions, and macroeconomic conditions change alongside notification volume?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Merger Review.topic-question:merger-review:hsr-transactionsHow did filing mix, transaction size, thresholds, exemptions, and macroeconomic conditions change alongside notification volume?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route
Merger ReviewtopicDeclared agenda membershipQ45, How did transaction mix, clearance, adjusted denominators, and agency review practice change alongside the observed rate?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Merger Review.topic-question:merger-review:hsr-second-request-rateHow did transaction mix, clearance, adjusted denominators, and agency review practice change alongside the observed rate?questionboundedResearch topic agenda contractNo direct source route

Complete type packet

Reuse all 58 exact edges

Downloads preserve endpoints, edge wording, semantic type, layer, confidence, source custody, and edge-specific guardrails.
Research question membership in topic | Atlas Ontology | Antitrust Radar