Relationship census
Atlas family 07 of 13
Questions
Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicators. This family profile audits every canonical member and every incident declared relationship without converting connectivity into economic importance.Incident links0exact edgesCustody0.0%source-linked
Partner families
No partner contract in this layerAll 46 canonical members remain in the register.
- Family members
- 46
- 0.8% of Atlas nodes
- Active members
- 0
- Measurement
- Incident edges
- 0
- 0.0% of full graph
- Partner families
- 0
- exact contracts
- Source-linked
- 0.0%
- 0 custody routes
- Composite score
- None
- counts remain separate
What this family profile measuresCanonical members, incident declared edges, partner-family contracts, relationship types, confidence labels, and source custody in the selected layer.
What it does not establishEconomic importance, substitutability, ownership, control, liability, causation, market power, or antitrust harm.
Family connection profile
How questions connect
Change relationship layers without changing the canonical family population.104all-layer incident edges
No incident relationship contract is declared for questions in measurement.
Relationship composition
What these links encode
No relationship type is active in this layer.
Member hubs
Which profiles carry the links
No member carries an incident edge in this layer.
Source custody
Where family declarations come from
- Source-linked edges
- 0
- 0.0% of active layer
- Custody routes
- 0
- deduplicated records or URLs
- Without source URL
- 0
- declared editorial or crosswalk contracts
- Confidence labels
- 0
- No active edges
This active layer has no registered row-level public source URL. That absence remains explicit and does not become source evidence by implication.
Exact family register
Inspect every canonical research question
46 matching profiles · page 1 of 2| Questions | Profile measure | Declared relationships | Source custody | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question:market-hhi:us-browser-usage | 3,612Herfindahl-Hirschman Index · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question:market-hhi:us-mobile-operating-system-usage | 5,337Herfindahl-Hirschman Index · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question:market-hhi:us-search-engine-usage | 7,359Herfindahl-Hirschman Index · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question:market-hhi:us-social-media-referral-traffic | 4,995Herfindahl-Hirschman Index · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-cr4:us-browser-usage | 93.8%Four-participant concentration ratio · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-leader-share:us-browser-usage | 50.0%Leading-participant share · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-cr4:us-mobile-operating-system-usage | 100.0%Four-participant concentration ratio · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-leader-share:us-mobile-operating-system-usage | 63.1%Leading-participant share · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-cr4:us-search-engine-usage | 99.4%Four-participant concentration ratio · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-leader-share:us-search-engine-usage | 85.2%Leading-participant share · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-cr4:us-social-media-referral-traffic | 94.4%Four-participant concentration ratio · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-leader-share:us-social-media-referral-traffic | 68.9%Leading-participant share · 2026 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| How can the nearly stable national aggregate be reconciled with state-level movement, organization turnover, branch change, and nominal deposit growth?question:national-bank-deposit-hhi | 401National bank-deposit HHI · 2025 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| How did filing mix, transaction size, thresholds, exemptions, and macroeconomic conditions change alongside notification volume?question:hsr-transactions | 2,006Reported HSR transactions · 2025 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| How did transaction mix, clearance, adjusted denominators, and agency review practice change alongside the observed rate?question:hsr-second-request-rate | 2.1%Second Request rate · 2025 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| How much of the change in net job creation comes from gross creation versus destruction, and which sectors or firm-age groups drive it?question:business-dynamism:net-job-creation-rate | 2.5%Net job creation rate · 2023 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| What provider-share, technology, speed-tier, entry, and geographic composition changes explain the rise in national HHI while median subnational HHIs declined?question:fixed-broadband-hhi:nation | 1,501Residential fixed broadband National HHI · 2024 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which areas and provider-share changes account for movement in the county median, and how wide is the distribution hidden by the median?question:fixed-broadband-hhi:county-median | 4,599Residential fixed broadband County median · 2024 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which areas and provider-share changes account for movement in the state median, and how wide is the distribution hidden by the median?question:fixed-broadband-hhi:state-median | 2,937Residential fixed broadband State median · 2024 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which areas and provider-share changes account for movement in the tract median, and how wide is the distribution hidden by the median?question:fixed-broadband-hhi:tract-median | 5,504Residential fixed broadband Tract median · 2024 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which closing and contracting establishments, sectors, places, or firm-age groups account for the change in gross job destruction?question:business-dynamism:job-destruction-rate | 11.1%Job destruction rate · 2023 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question:market-hhi:us-fixed-broadband-access | 1,501Herfindahl-Hirschman Index · 2024 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?question:market-hhi:us-mobile-wireless-service | 3,550Herfindahl-Hirschman Index · 2023 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which opening and expanding establishments, sectors, places, or firm-age groups account for the change in gross job creation?question:business-dynamism:job-creation-rate | 13.6%Job creation rate · 2023 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |
| Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?question:market-cr4:us-steer-heifer-meatpacking-purchases | 85.0%Four-participant concentration ratio · 2019 | No links in this layer | 0 source-linked0 custody routes · No active layer | Open |