Skip to main content
Public Data NotesAR-DN-2026-02

Housing Competition Needs Local Ownership Data

Source-backed housing profile note

Central finding

Housing competition cannot be reduced to one national HHI.

Descriptive concentration measures do not by themselves establish competitive harm, unlawful conduct, or a causal effect.

4
sources
1
market
Withheld
HHI status

Publication accountability

Recorded source access / review
. This is not an independent review date.
Authorship and responsibility
Antitrust Radar Research Team. Publication custody and revision record.
Evidence overview

Report evidence navigator

Read by chapter, source record, and declared boundary.

Open data

Executive findings

Executive findings

An open brief explaining why housing affordability and supply stress require local competition data before HHI can be responsibly reported.

4
Cited sources
1
markets
3
Public asks
Interpretation boundaryHarvard JCHS renter cost-burden data, Freddie Mac supply-shortage estimate, GAO selected single-family rental investor ownership data, and FTC/DOJ roll-up inquiry materials.
Sources, citations, and policy proposals

Public action docket

What government can require next

3 asks

ForHUD, FTC, DOJ, local housing agencies, and state legislators

  1. 01
    Publish local ownership and control data

    Create public registries that identify beneficial ownership, property management, investor class, and common control at local-market geographies.

  2. 02
    Tie public benefits to disclosure

    Condition subsidies, tax incentives, public land deals, and major zoning approvals on auditable ownership and control reporting.

  3. 03
    Track roll-ups before they become invisible

    Monitor serial acquisitions, property-management consolidation, and institutional holdings at the metro and neighborhood level.

Evidence still needed

Beneficial ownerProperty managerUnit geography
Open advocacy brief

Reader packet

Reusable

Canonical citation

Antitrust Radar Research Team. (2026, June 21). Housing Competition Needs Local Ownership Data: Source-backed housing profile note. Public Data Notes, AR-DN-2026-02 (Version 1.0). Antitrust Radar. https://antitrustradar.org/reports/housing-competition-data-gap

JSONCSV
BibTeXRIS

Source basis

Harvard JCHS renter cost-burden data, Freddie Mac supply-shortage estimate, GAO selected single-family rental investor ownership data, and FTC/DOJ roll-up inquiry materials.

4

Source records

1

Related market

3

academic paper, industry report, agency report

Source types

5

Evidence asks

Read the briefing

Evidence index

Claim to public action

Published Jun 21, 2026 · sources through Jun 21, 2026 · version 1.0 · Current edition

Read / Briefing claim

Start with the authored claim and its analytical boundary.

Start with the harm theory, market frame, and limits.

Interpretation boundaryRead the finding with the report's declared market, geography, vintage, and limitations.
Read the analysis

Housing choice observatory

Where does housing pressure become a competition question?

Preparing the bounded national context and local ownership evidence.

Executive summary

Housing competition cannot be reduced to one national HHI. Harvard JCHS reports 22.7 million cost-burdened renter households in 2024, Freddie Mac estimates a 3.7 million-home supply shortage as of Q3 2024, and GAO reports that institutional investors owned 22 percent of single-family rental homes in Jacksonville but 4 percent in Seattle in 2024. Those facts show why local market power matters, but they do not provide comparable firm-level local rental market shares. Antitrust Radar therefore publishes the public evidence, labels the local data gap, and withholds HHI until citable firm-level local shares are available.

22.7M

cost-burdened renter households

Harvard JCHS reports the 2024 renter burden that makes local competition evidence urgent.

Harvard JCHS

3.7M

home supply shortage

Freddie Mac estimates the U.S. shortage as of Q3 2024, before local ownership shares are visible.

Freddie Mac

22% / 4%

selected investor ownership range

GAO reports 22% in Jacksonville and 4% in Seattle, showing why national averages miss local power.

GAO

No HHI

without local firm shares

The report withholds HHI until public ownership, control, and rental-share data can support it.

Antitrust Radar rule

Research map

What this briefing connects

  • Why housing is local
  • Affordability and supply stress
  • Selected ownership evidence
  • Data needed for HHI

Source basis

Harvard JCHS renter cost-burden data, Freddie Mac supply-shortage estimate, GAO selected single-family rental investor ownership data, and FTC/DOJ roll-up inquiry materials.

Related markets

Methodology and limits matter

This report uses public records and descriptive concentration indicators. It does not claim a legal market definition by itself, and readers should evaluate source vintage, geography, missing firms, and whether the public data measures usage, revenue, prescriptions, passengers, or another proxy.

Source basis

Harvard JCHS renter cost-burden data, Freddie Mac supply-shortage estimate, GAO selected single-family rental investor ownership data, and FTC/DOJ roll-up inquiry materials.

Source register

4 cited public records

01 / 4
academic paper2026

Source 01

America's Rental Housing 2026

Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies

Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, America's Rental Housing 2026, released March 2026.

Public research report on U.S. rental housing conditions and renter cost burdens.

Accessed
Jun 21, 2026
Custody
Public university research report

Related reports

Research actions

Public action memoImmediate

What public institutions should do next

Housing competition must be measured locally: affordability stress and supply shortages are public harms, but HHI needs local ownership and control data.

Audience

HUD, FTC, DOJ, local housing agencies, and state legislators

1Publish local ownership and control dataCreate public registries that identify beneficial ownership, property management, investor class, and common control at local-market geographies.
2Tie public benefits to disclosureCondition subsidies, tax incentives, public land deals, and major zoning approvals on auditable ownership and control reporting.
3Track roll-ups before they become invisibleMonitor serial acquisitions, property-management consolidation, and institutional holdings at the metro and neighborhood level.
Evidence needed
Beneficial ownerProperty managerUnit geographyLocal rental shareAcquisition timeline
Connect to advocacy playbooks

Policy claims are framed as public-interest asks, not legal conclusions. Each ask should be read with the report’s source basis and limitations.