Skip to main content

Cross-domain evidence graph

Observatory atlas

Follow documented connections between markets, firms, places, publications, and sources. A connection shows a recorded relationship, not that two measures describe the same market.

Live family topologyResearch

Current focusMarket Structure547 records / 9 family pairs

Research topology centered on Market StructureLine width represents declared relationship count. Line color identifies relationship layer. Circle size represents the number of canonical profiles in each family.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Indicators to Sources: 2 declared links. Research 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 45 links in Research, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1,866Industries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in Research, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in Research, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3,270Places: 3,270 canonical profiles, 114 links in Research, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 48 links in Research, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in Research, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Research compact topology centered on Market StructureTap a family or weighted route to inspect its declared neighborhood, then use the dossier action below to open the complete record. Circle size represents canonical profile count.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Indicators to Sources: 2 declared links. Research 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 45 links in Research, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1.9kIndustries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in Research, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in Research, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3.3kPlaces: 3,270 canonical profiles, 114 links in Research, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 48 links in Research, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in Research, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Canonical nodes5,4785433 public profiles
Declared edges19,193exact encoded links
Node families13bounded domains
Inferred links0name-only joins
Encoded hereProfile-to-indicator observations, issue-program scope, source custody, market participation, official attribution, declared industry context, publication scope, and dated policy relationships.
Never inferred hereSubstitutability, ownership, control, liability, causation, or comparability across unlike measures.
Read evidence standard

Graph census · Research

Who the Atlas connects

Every lane is an exact family-pair contract in the active semantic lens, ranked by encoded edge count.

8 of 13families connectedTop 8 routes carry 99.6% of active-layer edges.

Active-lens edges
547
Research
Family-pair routes
9
exact family contracts
Cross-family pairs
9
between unlike families
Self-family pairs
0
within one family
Open the complete relationship matrixScan all 91 possible family contracts by edge volume or source custody, including explicit structural zeros.
  1. 01PublicationsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier16930.9%
  2. 02PlacesPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier11420.8%
  3. 03TopicsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier9717.7%
  4. 04TopicsQuestionsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier5810.6%
  5. 05QuestionsIndicatorsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier468.4%
  6. 06MarketsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier336.0%
  7. 07IssuesTopicsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier162.9%
  8. 08MarketsIssuesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier122.2%
Inspect the remaining 1 family-pair routes2 links · 0.4% of active-layer edges
  1. 09IndicatorsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier20.4%
Bar length uses a logarithmic scale so low-volume lanes remain visible.Counts and shares describe encoded relationships, not economic importance, substitutability, control, liability, or antitrust harm.

Graph query

Build a declared relationship neighborhood

Network depth
TopicsMarket StructureResearch / 2 hops / all neighbors
Semantic classificationAll 39 relationship contracts remain distinctRead ontology

Choose one exact semantic contract to rebuild the topology, neighborhood, diagnostics, ledger, and public exports around only that declared edge type.

Focused evidence graph

Market Structure

68 connected nodes in this bounded slice
Visible nodes
48
of 68
Visible edges
117
declared links
Direct links
30
from focus
Hidden nodes
20
plot cap only
Direct neighborhood30

12 additional matches remain in the public packet.

Focused declared relationship network for Market StructureNodes are placed by graph distance from the selected profile. Color identifies node type. Lines identify encoded relationships in the selected semantic lens.Market Structure9Market Structure: Publication memberships 9Digital gatewaysDigital platform gateways: Bounded markets 5CommunicationsCommunications infrastructure: Bounded markets 2Food buyer powerFood systems and buyer power: Bounded markets 1Health intermedia...Health care intermediaries: Bounded markets 2Housing accessHousing access and local power: Bounded markets 1TransportationTransportation networks: Bounded markets 1Browsers: Herfind...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 3,612Mobile operating...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 5,337Search engines: H...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 7,359Social referrals:...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 4,995Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 93.8%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 100.0%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 99.4%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 94.4%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 50.0%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 63.1%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 85.2%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 68.9%Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 1,501Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 3,550Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 85.0%The U.S. Competition Landscape: Evidence sources 14Latest market-structure signals moved in both directions.: Exact signals 15Five Digital Gateways: Evidence sources 5Four digital usage systems traced four different structural paths.: Exact signals 12How HHI Helps Explain Market Concentration: Evidence sources 3Beef Meatpacking Buyer Power: Evidence sources 3Fixed Broadband Concentration Across Geographic Scales, 2020-2024: Evidence sources 1State Individual Insurance Concentration, 2024: Evidence sources 1State Banking Structure, 2015-2025: Evidence sources 1U.S. browser usage: Latest HHI 3,612U.S. search engine usage: Latest HHI 7,359U.S. social-media referral traffic: Latest HHI 4,995U.S. mobile operating-system web usage: Latest HHI 5,337U.S. mobile wireless service: Latest HHI 3,550U.S. steer and heifer purchases by beef packers: HHI status WithheldIndustry Structure: Publication memberships 4Geographic Competition: Publication memberships 7Digital Platforms: Publication memberships 2Merger Review: Publication memberships 3Methods and Public Data: Publication memberships 3Tracked market HHI: Observation rows 26Tracked market CR4: Observation rows 21Tracked leading-participant share: Observation rows 182022 Economic Census Concentration of Largest Firms: Access date 2026-07-17Browser market share in United States of America, April 2023-April 2026: Access date 2026-07-17Search engine market share in United States of America, April 2023-April 2026: Access date 2026-07-17
Markets12Products55Operators20Industries1866Issues6Topics8Questions46Places3270Indicators30Records14Named entities21Publications85Sources45
TopicsMarket StructureAR-T01 / 6 issue programs / 5 evidence lanes
Publication memberships
9
Status
institutional research topic
Declared links
30
Latest year
2026

Where is market power concentrated, how is structure changing, and which competitive mechanism still needs to be tested?

Open canonical profile
Analysis handoff0

No direct measure declaredSelect a measured market, detailed industry, state, indicator, or source from the relationship graph to open exact analytical rows.

Direct relationships30

Direct relationship fingerprint

How Market Structure is declared in the Atlas

Research / direct focus links / no composite score
Counterparties
30
Unique canonical endpoints
Encoded links
30
Exact focus edges
Source custody
0%
0 source-bearing links
Profile families
3
Direct counterparty types
Counterparty compositionDirect nodes by profile family
Unique endpoints / active layer
Questions15 encoded edges
15
Publications9 encoded edges
9
Issues6 encoded edges
6
Declared counterpartiesCarry exact endpoints into deeper analysis
30 available
01
1 edge0 source-bearing
02
1 edge0 source-bearing
03
1 edge0 source-bearing
04
1 edge0 source-bearing
05
1 edge0 source-bearing
06
1 edge0 source-bearing
Showing 6 of 30 exact direct counterparties.
Direct layer mixMeasurement0Organization0Enforcement0Research30
Encoded confidencehigh0medium0bounded30low0

Relationship ledger

Every plotted line remains an inspectable record

158 edges survive the current focus, depth, node-type, layer, and semantic-type contract.

ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. residential fixed broadband access is an explicitly curated member of the Communications infrastructure research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. mobile wireless service is an explicitly curated member of the Communications infrastructure research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. generative AI assistant usage is an explicitly curated member of the Digital platform gateways research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. browser usage is an explicitly curated member of the Digital platform gateways research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. mobile operating-system web usage is an explicitly curated member of the Digital platform gateways research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. search engine usage is an explicitly curated member of the Digital platform gateways research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. social-media referral traffic is an explicitly curated member of the Digital platform gateways research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. steer and heifer purchases by beef packers is an explicitly curated member of the Food systems and buyer power research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. ACA individual health insurance is an explicitly curated member of the Health care intermediaries research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. pharmacy benefit management is an explicitly curated member of the Health care intermediaries research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. rental housing access is an explicitly curated member of the Housing access and local power research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded
ResearchIssue program membershipissue scope

U.S. domestic airline passengers is an explicitly curated member of the Transportation networks research program while retaining its own product boundary, geography, denominator, and comparison contract.

Competition issue scope contractbounded

Showing 8 of 158 exact relationships. The complete filtered ledger remains available in CSV.

146 additional exact edges are available in JSON and CSV.

Graph contract

Relationship families stay separate

The atlas joins routes through encoded custody and context, never through name resemblance or an inferred corporate, legal, or causal relationship.

The atlas exposes only relationships declared in the current public data. A link or issue grouping does not make unlike measures comparable, establish ownership or control, define an antitrust market, assign liability, or show that a policy event caused an economic outcome.

Reusable graph packet

Carry node and edge custody into analysis

The packet preserves node type, canonical route, relationship family, source link, evidence label, confidence, and edge-specific guardrail.