Antitrust Radar

Cross-domain evidence graph

Observatory atlas

Follow documented connections between markets, firms, places, publications, and sources. A connection shows a recorded relationship, not that two measures describe the same market.

Explore the graphRank profilesCompare profiles
More atlas tools4 exact routes
Live family topologyAll declared links

Current focusMarket Structure19,193 records / 27 family pairs

All declared links topology centered on Market StructureLine width represents declared relationship count. Line color identifies relationship layer. Circle size represents the number of canonical profiles in each family.Places to Indicators: 6,412 declared links. Measurement 6,412.Places to Sources: 3,378 declared links. Measurement 3,378.Places to Places: 3,204 declared links. Measurement 3,204.Industries to Sources: 1,954 declared links. Measurement 1,954.Industries to Industries: 1,849 declared links. Measurement 1,849.Industries to Indicators: 1,576 declared links. Measurement 1,576.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Markets to Products: 55 declared links. Measurement 55.Indicators to Sources: 50 declared links. Measurement 48, Research 2.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Records to Named entities: 31 declared links. Enforcement 31.Products to Operators: 28 declared links. Organization 28.Markets to Indicators: 21 declared links. Measurement 21.Markets to Sources: 20 declared links. Measurement 20.Markets to Records: 18 declared links. Enforcement 18.Industries to Places: 17 declared links. Measurement 17.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Records to Sources: 14 declared links. Enforcement 14.Markets to Industries: 12 declared links. Measurement 12.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Operators to Named entities: 4 declared links. Organization 4.Sources to Sources: 3 declared links. Measurement 3.Products to Named entities: 2 declared links. Organization 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 171 links in All declared links, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 85 links in All declared links, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 32 links in All declared links, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1,866Industries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 5,408 links in All declared links, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in All declared links, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in All declared links, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in All declared links, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3,270Places: 3,270 canonical profiles, 13,125 links in All declared links, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 8,105 links in All declared links, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 63 links in All declared links, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 37 links in All declared links, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in All declared links, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 5,588 links in All declared links, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
All declared links compact topology centered on Market StructureTap a family or weighted route to inspect its declared neighborhood, then use the dossier action below to open the complete record. Circle size represents canonical profile count.Places to Indicators: 6,412 declared links. Measurement 6,412.Places to Sources: 3,378 declared links. Measurement 3,378.Places to Places: 3,204 declared links. Measurement 3,204.Industries to Sources: 1,954 declared links. Measurement 1,954.Industries to Industries: 1,849 declared links. Measurement 1,849.Industries to Indicators: 1,576 declared links. Measurement 1,576.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Markets to Products: 55 declared links. Measurement 55.Indicators to Sources: 50 declared links. Measurement 48, Research 2.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Records to Named entities: 31 declared links. Enforcement 31.Products to Operators: 28 declared links. Organization 28.Markets to Indicators: 21 declared links. Measurement 21.Markets to Sources: 20 declared links. Measurement 20.Markets to Records: 18 declared links. Enforcement 18.Industries to Places: 17 declared links. Measurement 17.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Records to Sources: 14 declared links. Enforcement 14.Markets to Industries: 12 declared links. Measurement 12.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Operators to Named entities: 4 declared links. Organization 4.Sources to Sources: 3 declared links. Measurement 3.Products to Named entities: 2 declared links. Organization 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 171 links in All declared links, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 85 links in All declared links, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 32 links in All declared links, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1.9kIndustries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 5,408 links in All declared links, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in All declared links, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in All declared links, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in All declared links, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3.3kPlaces: 3,270 canonical profiles, 13,125 links in All declared links, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 8,105 links in All declared links, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 63 links in All declared links, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 37 links in All declared links, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in All declared links, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 5,588 links in All declared links, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Canonical nodes5,4785433 public profiles
Declared edges19,193exact encoded links
Node families13bounded domains
Inferred links0name-only joins
Encoded hereProfile-to-indicator observations, issue-program scope, source custody, market participation, official attribution, declared industry context, publication scope, and dated policy relationships.
Never inferred hereSubstitutability, ownership, control, liability, causation, or comparability across unlike measures.
Read evidence standard

Graph census · All declared links

Who the Atlas connects

Every lane is an exact family-pair contract in the active semantic lens, ranked by encoded edge count.

13 of 13families connectedTop 8 routes carry 97.2% of active-layer edges.

Active-lens edges
19,193
All declared links
Family-pair routes
27
exact family contracts
Cross-family pairs
24
between unlike families
Self-family pairs
3
within one family
Open the complete relationship matrixScan all 91 possible family contracts by edge volume or source custody, including explicit structural zeros.
  1. 01PlacesIndicatorsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier6,41233.4%
  2. 02PlacesSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier3,37817.6%
  3. 03PlacesPlacesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier3,20416.7%
  4. 04IndustriesSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier1,95410.2%
  5. 05IndustriesIndustriesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier1,8499.6%
  6. 06IndustriesIndicatorsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier1,5768.2%
  7. 07PublicationsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier1690.9%
  8. 08PlacesPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier1140.6%
Inspect the remaining 19 family-pair routes537 links · 2.8% of active-layer edges
  1. 09TopicsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier970.5%
  2. 10TopicsQuestionsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier580.3%
  3. 11MarketsProductsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier550.3%
  4. 12IndicatorsSourcesMeasurement + Research layer · open complete contract dossier500.3%
  5. 13QuestionsIndicatorsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier460.2%
  6. 14MarketsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier330.2%
  7. 15RecordsNamed entitiesEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier310.2%
  8. 16ProductsOperatorsOrganization layer · open complete contract dossier280.1%
  9. 17MarketsIndicatorsMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier210.1%
  10. 18MarketsSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier200.1%
  11. 19MarketsRecordsEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier18<0.1%
  12. 20IndustriesPlacesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier17<0.1%
  13. 21IssuesTopicsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier16<0.1%
  14. 22RecordsSourcesEnforcement layer · open complete contract dossier14<0.1%
  15. 23MarketsIndustriesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier12<0.1%
  16. 24MarketsIssuesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier12<0.1%
  17. 25OperatorsNamed entitiesOrganization layer · open complete contract dossier4<0.1%
  18. 26SourcesSourcesMeasurement layer · open complete contract dossier3<0.1%
  19. 27ProductsNamed entitiesOrganization layer · open complete contract dossier2<0.1%
Bar length uses a logarithmic scale so low-volume lanes remain visible.Counts and shares describe encoded relationships, not economic importance, substitutability, control, liability, or antitrust harm.

Graph query

Build a declared relationship neighborhood

Network depth
TopicsMarket StructureAll declared links / 1 hop / all neighbors
Semantic classificationAll 39 relationship contracts remain distinctRead ontology

Choose one exact semantic contract to rebuild the topology, neighborhood, diagnostics, ledger, and public exports around only that declared edge type.

Focused evidence graph

Market Structure

31 connected nodes in this bounded slice
Visible nodes
31
of 31
Visible edges
30
declared links
Direct links
30
from focus
Hidden nodes
0
plot cap only
Direct neighborhood30

12 additional matches remain in the public packet.

Focused declared relationship network for Market StructureNodes are placed by graph distance from the selected profile. Color identifies node type. Lines identify encoded relationships in the selected semantic lens.Market Structure9Market Structure: Publication memberships 9Digital gatewaysDigital platform gateways: Bounded markets 5CommunicationsCommunications infrastructure: Bounded markets 2Food buyer powerFood systems and buyer power: Bounded markets 1Health intermedia...Health care intermediaries: Bounded markets 2Housing accessHousing access and local power: Bounded markets 1TransportationTransportation networks: Bounded markets 1Browsers: Herfind...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 3,612Mobile operating...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 5,337Search engines: H...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 7,359Social referrals:...Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 4,995Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 93.8%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 100.0%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 99.4%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 94.4%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 50.0%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 63.1%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 85.2%Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Leading-participant share 68.9%Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 1,501Which entry, exit, share, switching, price, quality, or capacity evidence can explain the movement inside this exact market boundary?: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 3,550Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 85.0%The U.S. Competition Landscape: Evidence sources 14Latest market-structure signals moved in both directions.: Exact signals 15Five Digital Gateways: Evidence sources 5Four digital usage systems traced four different structural paths.: Exact signals 12How HHI Helps Explain Market Concentration: Evidence sources 3Beef Meatpacking Buyer Power: Evidence sources 3Fixed Broadband Concentration Across Geographic Scales, 2020-2024: Evidence sources 1State Individual Insurance Concentration, 2024: Evidence sources 1State Banking Structure, 2015-2025: Evidence sources 1
Markets12Products55Operators20Industries1866Issues6Topics8Questions46Places3270Indicators30Records14Named entities21Publications85Sources45
TopicsMarket StructureAR-T01 / 6 issue programs / 5 evidence lanes
Publication memberships
9
Status
institutional research topic
Declared links
30
Latest year
2026

Where is market power concentrated, how is structure changing, and which competitive mechanism still needs to be tested?

Open canonical profile
Analysis handoff0

No direct measure declaredSelect a measured market, detailed industry, state, indicator, or source from the relationship graph to open exact analytical rows.

Direct relationships30

Direct relationship fingerprint

How Market Structure is declared in the Atlas

All declared links / direct focus links / no composite score
Counterparties
30
Unique canonical endpoints
Encoded links
30
Exact focus edges
Source custody
0%
0 source-bearing links
Profile families
3
Direct counterparty types
Counterparty compositionDirect nodes by profile family
Unique endpoints / active layer
Questions15 encoded edges
15
Publications9 encoded edges
9
Issues6 encoded edges
6
Declared counterpartiesCarry exact endpoints into deeper analysis
30 available
01
1 edge0 source-bearing
02
1 edge0 source-bearing
03
1 edge0 source-bearing
04
1 edge0 source-bearing
05
1 edge0 source-bearing
06
1 edge0 source-bearing
Showing 6 of 30 exact direct counterparties.
Direct layer mixMeasurement0Organization0Enforcement0Research30
Encoded confidencehigh0medium0bounded30low0

Relationship ledger

Every plotted line remains an inspectable record

30 edges survive the current focus, depth, node-type, layer, and semantic-type contract.

ResearchDeclared issue-program membershiptopic issue

Communications infrastructure is explicitly included in the Market Structure institutional research contract.

Research topic issue contractbounded
ResearchDeclared issue-program membershiptopic issue

Digital platform gateways is explicitly included in the Market Structure institutional research contract.

Research topic issue contractbounded
ResearchDeclared issue-program membershiptopic issue

Food systems and buyer power is explicitly included in the Market Structure institutional research contract.

Research topic issue contractbounded
ResearchDeclared issue-program membershiptopic issue

Health care intermediaries is explicitly included in the Market Structure institutional research contract.

Research topic issue contractbounded
ResearchDeclared issue-program membershiptopic issue

Housing access and local power is explicitly included in the Market Structure institutional research contract.

Research topic issue contractbounded
ResearchDeclared issue-program membershiptopic issue

Transportation networks is explicitly included in the Market Structure institutional research contract.

Research topic issue contractbounded
ResearchDeclared topic membershiptopic publication

AR-CI-2026-01, Latest market-structure signals moved in both directions., carries the exact Market Structure publication-theme membership.

Publication theme contractbounded
ResearchDeclared topic membershiptopic publication

AR-CI-2026-02, Four digital usage systems traced four different structural paths., carries the exact Market Structure publication-theme membership.

Publication theme contractbounded
ResearchDeclared topic membershiptopic publication

AR-MM-2026-01, How HHI Helps Explain Market Concentration, carries the exact Market Structure publication-theme membership.

Publication theme contractbounded
ResearchDeclared topic membershiptopic publication

AR-RB-2026-01, Beef Meatpacking Buyer Power, carries the exact Market Structure publication-theme membership.

Publication theme contractbounded
ResearchDeclared topic membershiptopic publication

AR-RB-2026-02, Five Digital Gateways, carries the exact Market Structure publication-theme membership.

Publication theme contractbounded
ResearchDeclared topic membershiptopic publication

AR-RB-2026-03, State Banking Structure, 2015-2025, carries the exact Market Structure publication-theme membership.

Publication theme contractbounded

Showing 8 of 30 exact relationships. The complete filtered ledger remains available in CSV.

18 additional exact edges are available in JSON and CSV.

Graph contract

Relationship families stay separate

The atlas joins routes through encoded custody and context, never through name resemblance or an inferred corporate, legal, or causal relationship.

The atlas exposes only relationships declared in the current public data. A link or issue grouping does not make unlike measures comparable, establish ownership or control, define an antitrust market, assign liability, or show that a policy event caused an economic outcome.

Reusable graph packet

Carry node and edge custody into analysis

The packet preserves node type, canonical route, relationship family, source link, evidence label, confidence, and edge-specific guardrail.

Data CubeStart from the documented indicator registryVizBuilderBuild a source-backed public figureJSON graph/api/public/atlas?focus=topic%3Amarket-structure&depth=1CSV edge ledgerComplete exact relationship slice