Antitrust Radar
Bilateral Antitrust Radar evidence routeTwo canonical nodes connect through separately colored declared relationship edges and common evidence nodes.Profile ADeclared edgeCommon nodeDeclared edgeProfile B

Bilateral evidence profiles

Relationship studio

Compare two profiles through their documented relationships and shared records. An indirect connection is not evidence of a direct relationship.

Current declared routeMerger ReviewThe U.S. Competition La...1 shortest paths / 0 common neighbors / 1 supporting edges
Comparable nodes5,478canonical nodes
Declared edges19,193auditable links
Relationship layers4kept separate
Inferred endpoint links0from path proximity
Route contractEvery line is declared. Multi-hop proximity never becomes a direct endpoint claim.Evidence standard

Bilateral query

Build an exact profile-to-profile route

Profile A / TopicsMerger ReviewPublication memberships / 3
25 profiles directly connected to The U.S. Competition La...
Profile B / PublicationsThe U.S. Competition LandscapeEvidence sources / 14
6 profiles directly connected to Merger Review
Relationship familyAll declared linksEvery encoded relationship family
Declared route sets

Declared bilateral profile

Merger Review The U.S. Competition La...

All declared links / 1 hop
Shortest route
1declared hop
Shortest paths
1deterministic routes
Common neighbors
0exact intersections
Packet edges
10 cited sources
Relationship diagnosisWhat the selected graph can and cannot establish
Connection classDirect declaration1 endpoint edge
Neighborhood overlap0.0%0 shared across 31 unique adjacent profiles
Selected-layer degree7 vs 2619 neighbor difference
Supporting evidence0 cited sources1 exact packet edges
high0medium0bounded1low0
Profile A / TopicsMerger ReviewAR-T06 / 2 issue programs / 5 evidence lanes
Publication memberships
3
Selected-layer neighbors
7
Total neighbors
7
Latest year
2026
Connection fingerprint
Measurement0
Organization0
Enforcement0
Research7
Issues2Questions2Publications3
Open canonical profile
Declared routes from Merger Review to The U.S. Competition LandscapeThe primary shortest path is centered. Additional exact common neighbors appear above or below it. Every line is a declared edge and does not imply a direct endpoint relationship.Merger ReviewTopicsMerger Review: Publication memberships 3The U.S. Competition...PublicationsThe U.S. Competition Landscape: Evidence sources 14
MeasurementOrganizationEnforcementResearch
Profile B / PublicationsThe U.S. Competition Landscape8 linked markets
Evidence sources
14
Selected-layer neighbors
26
Total neighbors
26
Latest year
2026
Connection fingerprint
Measurement0
Organization0
Enforcement0
Research26
Markets8Topics4Sources14
Open canonical profile

Supporting edge ledger

Every bridge remains an inspectable declaration

1 exact edges support the shortest paths and common-neighbor intersections in this layer.

ResearchDeclared topic membershiptopic publication

AR-SC-2026-01, The U.S. Competition Landscape, carries the exact Merger Review publication-theme membership.

Publication theme contractbounded

Bilateral graph contract

A route is not a finding about its endpoints

Each hop keeps its own evidence label, confidence, source custody, and edge-specific limitation.

A bilateral atlas route preserves a sequence of declared edges for navigation and audit. A direct edge, common neighbor, or multi-hop path does not make the endpoints equivalent, establish ownership or control, assign liability, define an antitrust market, make unlike measures comparable, or show causation.

Reusable bilateral packet

Carry the exact route into analysis

JSON preserves endpoints, shortest paths, common neighbors, nodes, and edge metadata. CSV flattens the complete supporting ledger.

JSON comparison/api/public/atlas?left=topic%3Amerger-review&right=report%3Arep-us-competition-landscape-2026CSV edge ledgerExact supporting declarationsSingle-profile atlasReturn to focused neighborhoods