Bilateral evidence profiles
Relationship studio
Compare two profiles through their documented relationships and shared records. An indirect connection is not evidence of a direct relationship.
Current declared routeWIFederal Deposit Insur...1 shortest paths / 74 common neighbors / 149 supporting edges
Comparable nodes5,478canonical nodes
Declared edges19,193auditable links
Relationship layers4kept separate
Inferred endpoint links0from path proximity
Route contractEvery line is declared. Multi-hop proximity never becomes a direct endpoint claim.Evidence standard
Bilateral query
Build an exact profile-to-profile route
3,161 profiles directly connected to Federal Deposit Insur...
79 profiles directly connected to WI
Relationship familyAll declared linksEvery encoded relationship family
Declared route sets
Declared bilateral profile
WI Federal Deposit Insur...
All declared links / 1 hop- Shortest route
- 1declared hop
- Shortest paths
- 1deterministic routes
- Common neighbors
- 74exact intersections
- Packet edges
- 1491 cited sources
high147medium0bounded2low0
- Insurance HHI
- 1,474
- Selected-layer neighbors
- 80
- Total neighbors
- 80
- Latest year
- 2025
Connection fingerprint
Measurement80
Organization0
Enforcement0
Research0
Places73Indicators4Sources3
Open canonical profileMeasurementOrganizationEnforcementResearch
Route 01 / 1 hop
- Access date
- 2026-07-19
- Selected-layer neighbors
- 3,162
- Total neighbors
- 3,162
- Latest year
- 2026
Connection fingerprint
Measurement3159
Organization0
Enforcement0
Research3
Places3155Indicators4Publications3
Open canonical profileSupporting edge ledger
Every bridge remains an inspectable declaration
149 exact edges support the shortest paths and common-neighbor intersections in this layer.
Antitrust Radar sums positive June 30, 2025 branch deposits within each state, groups branches to the FDIC-reported top bank holding company when RSSDHCR is available and otherwise to the insured institution certificate, then calculates shares and HHI from those grouped balances.
Antitrust Radar sums positive June 30, 2025 branch deposits within each state, groups branches to the FDIC-reported top bank holding company when RSSDHCR is available and otherwise to the insured institution certificate, then calculates shares and HHI from those grouped balances.
Antitrust Radar sums positive June 30, 2025 branch deposits within each state, groups branches to the FDIC-reported top bank holding company when RSSDHCR is available and otherwise to the insured institution certificate, then calculates shares and HHI from those grouped balances.
Adams (55001) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Ashland (55003) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Barron (55005) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Bayfield (55007) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Brown (55009) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Buffalo (55011) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Burnett (55013) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Calumet (55015) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Chippewa (55017) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Clark (55019) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Columbia (55021) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Crawford (55023) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Dane (55025) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Dodge (55027) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Door (55029) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Douglas (55031) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Dunn (55033) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Eau Claire (55035) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Florence (55037) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Fond du Lac (55039) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Forest (55041) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Grant (55043) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Green (55045) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Green Lake (55047) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Iowa (55049) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Iron (55051) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Jackson (55053) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Jefferson (55055) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Juneau (55057) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Kenosha (55059) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Kewaunee (55061) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
La Crosse (55063) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Lafayette (55065) carries the exact Wisconsin (WI) geography fields in its 2025 FDIC county row.
Showing 36 of 149 exact supporting edges. The complete bilateral ledger remains available in JSON and CSV.
Bilateral graph contract
A route is not a finding about its endpoints
Each hop keeps its own evidence label, confidence, source custody, and edge-specific limitation.
A bilateral atlas route preserves a sequence of declared edges for navigation and audit. A direct edge, common neighbor, or multi-hop path does not make the endpoints equivalent, establish ownership or control, assign liability, define an antitrust market, make unlike measures comparable, or show causation.
Reusable bilateral packet
Carry the exact route into analysis
JSON preserves endpoints, shortest paths, common neighbors, nodes, and edge metadata. CSV flattens the complete supporting ledger.