2 exact items span every selected topic.
2 exact identifiers recur in two or more selected contracts. The widest pair is Merger Review with Geographic Competition: 2 shared items.
- Shared in 2+
- 2
- Shared by all
- 2
- Shared publications
- 1
Antitrust Radar research architecture
Compare research topics, publication histories, and shared evidence. Missing coverage remains visible and is not treated as a zero economic outcome.
Comparison standard. Topics connect only through exact publication IDs, agenda-question IDs, issue-program IDs, dataset IDs, or route paths. Shared custody does not establish shared findings, methods, importance, legal relevance, or causation.
Evidence standardResearch program comparison
Comparative evidence note
2 exact identifiers recur in two or more selected contracts. The widest pair is Merger Review with Geographic Competition: 2 shared items.
0 structural-zero cells remain across the selected contracts. A zero records the current editorial inventory, not the absence of relevant real-world evidence.
Exclusive means assigned to one selected editorial contract. It does not rank research depth, policy importance, evidentiary quality, or legal relevance.
Shared custody map
Exact shared-item register
AR-SC-2026-01 / 2026-07-19
How do route-level entry, capacity, airport constraints, and consolidation shape passenger choice beyond national shares?
Reproducibility contract
The studio derives every matrix cell, edge, and register row from the same topic model published through the public data endpoint.
Publication, agenda, issue, and dataset identifiers plus canonical route paths create the comparison ledger.
Empty membership lanes remain explicit and are never imputed from adjacent research programs.
Selected topic summaries and membership-level comparison packets are available as JSON and CSV.