Near-term / Data disclosure
Connect state screens to local competition evidence
Pair statewide deposit concentration with reproducible local deposit, lending, pricing, branch-access, digital-service, and customer-switching measures that better reflect where particular customers compete.Source records1report custody
Linked markets0analytical context
Research themes2publication taxonomy
Evidence needs5future verification inputs
The source boundary stays visible from analysis to proposed action.
State Banking Structure, 2015-2025
Public banking oversight should use annual statewide branch-deposit screens to locate structural change, then test those signals with local market, ownership, product, pricing, entry, and access evidence before drawing enforcement conclusions.
- Intended audience
- FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, DOJ, state attorneys general, and state banking agencies
- Policy priority
- Near-term
- Instrument
- Data disclosure
- Publication
- AR-RB-2026-03 / version 1.0
- Canonical citation
- Antitrust Radar Research Team. (2026, July 20). State Banking Structure, 2015-2025: Stable national concentration can coexist with large state-level shifts. Competition Research Briefs, AR-RB-2026-03 (Version 1.0). Antitrust Radar. https://antitrustradar.org/reports/state-banking-structure-2015-2025
Inputs required to investigate the recommendation and its effects.
- 01Annual branch-to-holding-company ownership crosswalks
- 02Merger, entry, exit, and reporting-change event records
- 03Local product-level deposit and lending shares
- 04Prices, fees, service quality, switching, and branch-access outcomes
- 05Inflation-adjusted and deposit-category context