Skip to main content

Cross-domain evidence graph

Observatory atlas

Follow documented connections between markets, firms, places, publications, and sources. A connection shows a recorded relationship, not that two measures describe the same market.

Live family topologyResearch

Current focusReview of Finance547 records / 9 family pairs

Research topology centered on Review of FinanceLine width represents declared relationship count. Line color identifies relationship layer. Circle size represents the number of canonical profiles in each family.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Indicators to Sources: 2 declared links. Research 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 45 links in Research, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1,866Industries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in Research, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in Research, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3,270Places: 3,270 canonical profiles, 114 links in Research, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 48 links in Research, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in Research, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Research compact topology centered on Review of FinanceTap a family or weighted route to inspect its declared neighborhood, then use the dossier action below to open the complete record. Circle size represents canonical profile count.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Indicators to Sources: 2 declared links. Research 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 45 links in Research, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1.9kIndustries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in Research, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in Research, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3.3kPlaces: 3,270 canonical profiles, 114 links in Research, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 48 links in Research, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in Research, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Canonical nodes5,4785433 public profiles
Declared edges19,193exact encoded links
Node families13bounded domains
Inferred links0name-only joins
Encoded hereProfile-to-indicator observations, issue-program scope, source custody, market participation, official attribution, declared industry context, publication scope, and dated policy relationships.
Never inferred hereSubstitutability, ownership, control, liability, causation, or comparability across unlike measures.
Read evidence standard

Graph census · Research

Who the Atlas connects

Every lane is an exact family-pair contract in the active semantic lens, ranked by encoded edge count.

8 of 13families connectedTop 8 routes carry 99.6% of active-layer edges.

Active-lens edges
547
Research
Family-pair routes
9
exact family contracts
Cross-family pairs
9
between unlike families
Self-family pairs
0
within one family
Open the complete relationship matrixScan all 91 possible family contracts by edge volume or source custody, including explicit structural zeros.
  1. 01PublicationsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier16930.9%
  2. 02PlacesPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier11420.8%
  3. 03TopicsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier9717.7%
  4. 04TopicsQuestionsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier5810.6%
  5. 05QuestionsIndicatorsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier468.4%
  6. 06MarketsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier336.0%
  7. 07IssuesTopicsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier162.9%
  8. 08MarketsIssuesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier122.2%
Inspect the remaining 1 family-pair routes2 links · 0.4% of active-layer edges
  1. 09IndicatorsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier20.4%
Bar length uses a logarithmic scale so low-volume lanes remain visible.Counts and shares describe encoded relationships, not economic importance, substitutability, control, liability, or antitrust harm.

Graph query

Build a declared relationship neighborhood

Network depth
SourcesAre US Industries Becoming More Concentrated?Research / 2 hops / all neighbors
Semantic classificationAll 39 relationship contracts remain distinctRead ontology

Choose one exact semantic contract to rebuild the topology, neighborhood, diagnostics, ledger, and public exports around only that declared edge type.

Focused evidence graph

Review of Finance

19 connected nodes in this bounded slice
Visible nodes
19
of 19
Visible edges
18
declared links
Direct links
1
from focus
Hidden nodes
0
plot cap only
Direct neighborhood1
Focused declared relationship network for Are US Industries Becoming More Concentrated?Nodes are placed by graph distance from the selected profile. Color identifies node type. Lines identify encoded relationships in the selected semantic lens.Review of Finance2026-08-05Are US Industries Becoming More Concentrated?: Access date 2026-08-05Industry HHIDetailed industry HHI: Observation rows 679Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 391Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 602Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 19Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 436Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 322Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 25Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 251Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 741Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 493Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 104Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 86Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 169Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 95Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 36Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 114Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 14Which six-digit industries drive the sector shift, and where do product, geography, entry, conduct, price, quality, or enforcement records justify deeper market-level research?: Median detailed-industry HHI 78
Markets12Products55Operators20Industries1866Issues6Topics8Questions46Places3270Indicators30Records14Named entities21Publications85Sources45
SourcesAre US Industries Becoming More Concentrated?Review of Finance
Access date
2026-08-05
Status
academic paper
Declared links
1
Latest year
2026

Peer-reviewed study of changes in concentration across U.S. industries since the late 1990s.

Open canonical profile
Analysis handoff1

No indicator row is keyed directly to this profile. These analytical contexts are one declared graph hop away.

Direct relationships1

Direct relationship fingerprint

How Review of Finance is declared in the Atlas

Research / direct focus links / no composite score
Counterparties
1
Unique canonical endpoints
Encoded links
1
Exact focus edges
Source custody
100%
1 source-bearing links
Profile families
1
Direct counterparty types
Counterparty compositionDirect nodes by profile family
Unique endpoints / active layer
Indicators1 encoded edge
1
Declared counterpartiesCarry exact endpoints into deeper analysis
1 available
01
1 edge1 source-bearing
Direct layer mixMeasurement0Organization0Enforcement0Research1
Encoded confidencehigh0medium0bounded1low0

Relationship ledger

Every plotted line remains an inspectable record

18 edges survive the current focus, depth, node-type, layer, and semantic-type contract.

ResearchContextual research literatureindicator reference

The peer-reviewed article studies changes in U.S. industry concentration since the late 1990s. It motivates longitudinal scrutiny of industry structure but supplies none of this indicator's 2022 Economic Census rows. Boundary: The paper's firm universe, measures, time window, and research design differ from the current Census industry-HHI contract. Its results are not joined to, pooled with, or used to validate these observations.

Grullon, Larkin, and Michaely / Review of Finance (2019)boundedSource
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q22 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q28 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q16 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q21 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q29 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q26 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q27 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q20 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q18 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q25 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q24 is framed by Median detailed-industry HHI and resolves to the canonical industry-hhi indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded

Showing 8 of 18 exact relationships. The complete filtered ledger remains available in CSV.

6 additional exact edges are available in JSON and CSV.

Graph contract

Relationship families stay separate

The atlas joins routes through encoded custody and context, never through name resemblance or an inferred corporate, legal, or causal relationship.

The atlas exposes only relationships declared in the current public data. A link or issue grouping does not make unlike measures comparable, establish ownership or control, define an antitrust market, assign liability, or show that a policy event caused an economic outcome.

Reusable graph packet

Carry node and edge custody into analysis

The packet preserves node type, canonical route, relationship family, source link, evidence label, confidence, and edge-specific guardrail.

Observatory Atlas | Antitrust Radar