Antitrust Radar

Cross-domain evidence graph

Observatory atlas

Follow documented connections between markets, firms, places, publications, and sources. A connection shows a recorded relationship, not that two measures describe the same market.

Explore the graphRank profilesCompare profiles
More atlas tools4 exact routes
Live family topologyResearch

Current focusMarket leader share547 records / 9 family pairs

Research topology centered on Market leader shareLine width represents declared relationship count. Line color identifies relationship layer. Circle size represents the number of canonical profiles in each family.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Indicators to Sources: 2 declared links. Research 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 45 links in Research, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1,866Industries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in Research, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in Research, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3,270Places: 3,270 canonical profiles, 114 links in Research, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 48 links in Research, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in Research, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Research compact topology centered on Market leader shareTap a family or weighted route to inspect its declared neighborhood, then use the dossier action below to open the complete record. Circle size represents canonical profile count.Publications to Sources: 169 declared links. Research 169.Places to Publications: 114 declared links. Research 114.Topics to Publications: 97 declared links. Research 97.Topics to Questions: 58 declared links. Research 58.Questions to Indicators: 46 declared links. Research 46.Markets to Publications: 33 declared links. Research 33.Issues to Topics: 16 declared links. Research 16.Markets to Issues: 12 declared links. Research 12.Indicators to Sources: 2 declared links. Research 2.Markets12Markets: 12 canonical profiles, 45 links in Research, 171 links overall. Documented antitrust and screening definitionsProducts55Products: 55 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 85 links overall. Source-labeled market participantsOperators20Operators: 20 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 32 links overall. Official product attributionsIndustries1.9kIndustries: 1,866 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 5,408 links overall. Census hierarchy and screening contextIssues6Issues: 6 canonical profiles, 28 links in Research, 28 links overall. Editorial competition research programsTopics8Topics: 8 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 171 links overall. Institutional research subjects and exact evidence membershipsQuestions46Questions: 46 canonical profiles, 104 links in Research, 104 links overall. Public research questions anchored to exact signals and indicatorsPlaces3.3kPlaces: 3,270 canonical profiles, 114 links in Research, 13,125 links overall. National context, bounded state and local screens, and international regulatory profilesIndicators30Indicators: 30 canonical profiles, 48 links in Research, 8,105 links overall. Canonical measurement dossiersRecords14Records: 14 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 63 links overall. Dated official enforcement recordsNamed entities21Named entities: 21 canonical profiles, 0 links in Research, 37 links overall. Organizations named in official recordsPublications85Publications: 85 canonical profiles, 413 links in Research, 413 links overall. Reports, data dispatches, and international evidence briefsSources45Sources: 45 canonical profiles, 171 links in Research, 5,588 links overall. Public evidence custody
Canonical nodes5,4785433 public profiles
Declared edges19,193exact encoded links
Node families13bounded domains
Inferred links0name-only joins
Encoded hereProfile-to-indicator observations, issue-program scope, source custody, market participation, official attribution, declared industry context, publication scope, and dated policy relationships.
Never inferred hereSubstitutability, ownership, control, liability, causation, or comparability across unlike measures.
Read evidence standard

Graph census · Research

Who the Atlas connects

Every lane is an exact family-pair contract in the active semantic lens, ranked by encoded edge count.

8 of 13families connectedTop 8 routes carry 99.6% of active-layer edges.

Active-lens edges
547
Research
Family-pair routes
9
exact family contracts
Cross-family pairs
9
between unlike families
Self-family pairs
0
within one family
Open the complete relationship matrixScan all 91 possible family contracts by edge volume or source custody, including explicit structural zeros.
  1. 01PublicationsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier16930.9%
  2. 02PlacesPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier11420.8%
  3. 03TopicsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier9717.7%
  4. 04TopicsQuestionsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier5810.6%
  5. 05QuestionsIndicatorsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier468.4%
  6. 06MarketsPublicationsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier336.0%
  7. 07IssuesTopicsResearch layer · open complete contract dossier162.9%
  8. 08MarketsIssuesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier122.2%
Inspect the remaining 1 family-pair routes2 links · 0.4% of active-layer edges
  1. 09IndicatorsSourcesResearch layer · open complete contract dossier20.4%
Bar length uses a logarithmic scale so low-volume lanes remain visible.Counts and shares describe encoded relationships, not economic importance, substitutability, control, liability, or antitrust harm.

Graph query

Build a declared relationship neighborhood

Network depth
IndicatorsTracked leading-participant shareResearch / 2 hops / all neighbors
Semantic classificationAll 39 relationship contracts remain distinctRead ontology

Choose one exact semantic contract to rebuild the topology, neighborhood, diagnostics, ledger, and public exports around only that declared edge type.

Focused evidence graph

Market leader share

7 connected nodes in this bounded slice
Visible nodes
7
of 7
Visible edges
12
declared links
Direct links
4
from focus
Hidden nodes
0
plot cap only
Direct neighborhood4
IndicatorsTracked leading-participant share6 entities / 2023-2026
Observation rows
18
Status
markets
Declared links
16
Latest year
2026

Largest sourced non-aggregate participant share in each released market anchor.

Open canonical profile
Analysis handoff1
One documented indicator contractTracked leading-participant share18 observation rows / 6 entities / 2023-2026
Chart lenses
Direct relationships4

Direct relationship fingerprint

How Market leader share is declared in the Atlas

Research / direct focus links / no composite score
Counterparties
4
Unique canonical endpoints
Encoded links
4
Exact focus edges
Source custody
0%
0 source-bearing links
Profile families
1
Direct counterparty types
Counterparty compositionDirect nodes by profile family
Unique endpoints / active layer
Questions4 encoded edges
4
Declared counterpartiesCarry exact endpoints into deeper analysis
4 available
01
1 edge0 source-bearing
02
1 edge0 source-bearing
03
1 edge0 source-bearing
04
1 edge0 source-bearing
Direct layer mixMeasurement0Organization0Enforcement0Research4
Encoded confidencehigh0medium0bounded4low0

Relationship ledger

Every plotted line remains an inspectable record

12 edges survive the current focus, depth, node-type, layer, and semantic-type contract.

ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q33 is framed by Leading-participant share and resolves to the canonical market-leader-share indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q37 is framed by Leading-participant share and resolves to the canonical market-leader-share indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q40 is framed by Leading-participant share and resolves to the canonical market-leader-share indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q43 is framed by Leading-participant share and resolves to the canonical market-leader-share indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q33, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Digital Platforms.

Research topic agenda contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q37, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Digital Platforms.

Research topic agenda contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q40, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Digital Platforms.

Research topic agenda contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q43, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Digital Platforms.

Research topic agenda contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q33, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.

Research topic agenda contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q37, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.

Research topic agenda contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q40, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.

Research topic agenda contractbounded
ResearchDeclared agenda membershiptopic question

Q43, Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?, is included by the exact domain or entity contract for Market Structure.

Research topic agenda contractbounded

Showing 8 of 12 exact relationships. The complete filtered ledger remains available in CSV.

Graph contract

Relationship families stay separate

The atlas joins routes through encoded custody and context, never through name resemblance or an inferred corporate, legal, or causal relationship.

The atlas exposes only relationships declared in the current public data. A link or issue grouping does not make unlike measures comparable, establish ownership or control, define an antitrust market, assign liability, or show that a policy event caused an economic outcome.

Reusable graph packet

Carry node and edge custody into analysis

The packet preserves node type, canonical route, relationship family, source link, evidence label, confidence, and edge-specific guardrail.

Data CubeExact Tracked leading-participant share observation sliceVizBuilderMarket leader share / ranking lensJSON graph/api/public/atlas?focus=indicator%3Amarket-leader-share&layer=researchCSV edge ledgerComplete exact relationship slice
Observatory Atlas | Antitrust Radar