Skip to main content
Bilateral Antitrust Radar evidence routeTwo canonical nodes connect through separately colored declared relationship edges and common evidence nodes.Profile ADeclared edgeCommon nodeDeclared edgeProfile B

Bilateral evidence profiles

Relationship studio

Compare two profiles through their documented relationships and shared records. An indirect connection is not evidence of a direct relationship.

Current declared routeSearch engines: Four-part...Market CR41 shortest paths / 0 common neighbors / 1 supporting edges
Comparable nodes5,478canonical nodes
Declared edges19,193auditable links
Relationship layers4kept separate
Inferred endpoint links0from path proximity
Route contractEvery line is declared. Multi-hop proximity never becomes a direct endpoint claim.Evidence standard

Bilateral query

Build an exact profile-to-profile route

Profile A / QuestionsWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Four-participant concentration ratio / 99.4%
18 profiles directly connected to Market CR4
Profile B / IndicatorsTracked market CR4Observation rows / 21
2 profiles directly connected to Search engines: Four-part...
Relationship familyAll declared linksEvery encoded relationship family
Declared route sets

Declared bilateral profile

Search engines: Four-part... Market CR4

All declared links / 1 hop
Shortest route
1declared hop
Shortest paths
1deterministic routes
Common neighbors
0exact intersections
Packet edges
10 cited sources
Relationship diagnosisWhat the selected graph can and cannot establish
Connection classDirect declaration1 endpoint edge
Neighborhood overlap0.0%0 shared across 20 unique adjacent profiles
Selected-layer degree3 vs 1916 neighbor difference
Supporting evidence0 cited sources1 exact packet edges
high0medium0bounded1low0
Profile A / QuestionsWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?Q38 / Shares / 2026
Four-participant concentration ratio
99.4%
Selected-layer neighbors
3
Total neighbors
3
Latest year
2026
Connection fingerprint
Measurement0
Organization0
Enforcement0
Research3
Topics2Indicators1
Open canonical profile
Declared routes from Which participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors? to Tracked market CR4The primary shortest path is centered. Additional exact common neighbors appear above or below it. Every line is a declared edge and does not imply a direct endpoint relationship.Search engines: Four-...QuestionsWhich participant-share changes account for the structural movement, and are the denominator and coverage stable across both anchors?: Four-participant concentration ratio 99.4%Market CR4IndicatorsTracked market CR4: Observation rows 21
MeasurementOrganizationEnforcementResearch
Profile B / IndicatorsTracked market CR47 entities / 1980-2026
Observation rows
21
Selected-layer neighbors
19
Total neighbors
19
Latest year
2026
Connection fingerprint
Measurement14
Organization0
Enforcement0
Research5
Markets7Questions5Sources7
Open canonical profile

Supporting edge ledger

Every bridge remains an inspectable declaration

1 exact edges support the shortest paths and common-neighbor intersections in this layer.

ResearchNamed measurement familyquestion indicator

Q38 is framed by Four-participant concentration ratio and resolves to the canonical market-cr4 indicator dossier.

Research agenda metric contractbounded

Bilateral graph contract

A route is not a finding about its endpoints

Each hop keeps its own evidence label, confidence, source custody, and edge-specific limitation.

A bilateral atlas route preserves a sequence of declared edges for navigation and audit. A direct edge, common neighbor, or multi-hop path does not make the endpoints equivalent, establish ownership or control, assign liability, define an antitrust market, make unlike measures comparable, or show causation.

Reusable bilateral packet

Carry the exact route into analysis

JSON preserves endpoints, shortest paths, common neighbors, nodes, and edge metadata. CSV flattens the complete supporting ledger.