{"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","dataset":"events","count":14,"rows":[{"id":"evt-pbm-caremark-settlement-2026","eventDate":"2026-07-14","year":2026,"title":"FTC announces proposed consent agreement with Caremark","agency":"Federal Trade Commission","eventType":"settlement","stage":"remedy","summary":"The FTC announced a proposed consent agreement with Caremark and Zinc Health Services addressing formulary design, point-of-sale rebates, fee structures, plan-sponsor transparency, community-pharmacy reimbursement, and access to pharmacy hub services.","significance":"Records announced remedy terms in the pending administrative matter. The filing does not establish realized savings, changes in PBM market structure, or a basis for calculating the withheld market HHI.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-pbm"],"sourceId":"ftc-caremark-settlement-2026","docketNumber":"Docket No. 9437","markets":[{"id":"mkt-pbm","slug":"us-pharmacy-benefit-management","name":"U.S. pharmacy benefit management","shortName":"PBMs"}],"sourceTitle":"FTC Secures Major Settlement with Caremark Resolving Antitrust Case Against Second Drug Middleman","sourcePublisher":"Federal Trade Commission","sourceUrl":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/07/ftc-secures-major-settlement-caremark-resolving-antitrust-case-against-second-drug-middleman","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/ftc-caremark-settlement-2026","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/pbm-caremark-settlement-2026","proceedingId":"proceeding-pbm-insulin","proceedingSlug":"pbm-insulin-rebate-case","proceedingTitle":"FTC insulin-rebate administrative matter","proceedingType":"administrative_case","proceedingSequence":3,"proceedingEventCount":3,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/pbm-insulin-rebate-case","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-caremark-rx","slug":"caremark-rx-llc","name":"Caremark Rx, LLC","role":"remedy_subject"},{"id":"pent-zinc-health","slug":"zinc-health-services-llc","name":"Zinc Health Services, LLC","role":"remedy_subject"}]},{"id":"evt-pbm-express-scripts-settlement-2026","eventDate":"2026-02-04","year":2026,"title":"FTC announces proposed consent agreement with Express Scripts","agency":"Federal Trade Commission","eventType":"settlement","stage":"remedy","summary":"The FTC announced a proposed consent agreement with Express Scripts and affiliated entities addressing formulary design, patient cost sharing, manufacturer compensation, plan-sponsor transparency, community-pharmacy reimbursement, and related business practices.","significance":"Records announced remedy terms in the pending administrative matter. The filing does not establish realized savings, changes in PBM market structure, or a basis for calculating the withheld market HHI.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-pbm"],"sourceId":"ftc-express-scripts-settlement-2026","docketNumber":"Docket No. 9437","markets":[{"id":"mkt-pbm","slug":"us-pharmacy-benefit-management","name":"U.S. pharmacy benefit management","shortName":"PBMs"}],"sourceTitle":"FTC Secures Landmark Settlement with Express Scripts to Lower Drug Costs for American Patients","sourcePublisher":"Federal Trade Commission","sourceUrl":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/02/ftc-secures-landmark-settlement-express-scripts-lower-drug-costs-american-patients","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/ftc-express-scripts-settlement-2026","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/pbm-express-scripts-settlement-2026","proceedingId":"proceeding-pbm-insulin","proceedingSlug":"pbm-insulin-rebate-case","proceedingTitle":"FTC insulin-rebate administrative matter","proceedingType":"administrative_case","proceedingSequence":2,"proceedingEventCount":3,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/pbm-insulin-rebate-case","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-ascent-health","slug":"ascent-health-services-llc","name":"Ascent Health Services, LLC","role":"remedy_subject"},{"id":"pent-express-scripts","slug":"express-scripts-inc","name":"Express Scripts, Inc.","role":"remedy_subject"}]},{"id":"evt-realpage-proposed-settlement-2025","eventDate":"2025-11-24","year":2025,"title":"DOJ files proposed settlement with RealPage","agency":"U.S. Department of Justice","eventType":"settlement","stage":"remedy","summary":"DOJ filed a proposed consent judgment requiring changes to nonpublic data use, model training, pricing features, information sharing, and compliance monitoring.","significance":"Records the proposed remedy path. Any effect on local rents or market structure requires later outcome evidence and should not be inferred from the filing alone.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-housing"],"sourceId":"doj-realpage-settlement-2025","docketNumber":"1:24-cv-00710","markets":[{"id":"mkt-housing","slug":"us-rental-housing-access","name":"U.S. rental housing access","shortName":"Rental housing"}],"sourceTitle":"Justice Department Requires RealPage to End Sharing of Competitively Sensitive Information","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-requires-realpage-end-sharing-competitively-sensitive-information-and","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-realpage-settlement-2025","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/realpage-proposed-settlement-2025","proceedingId":"proceeding-realpage","proceedingSlug":"realpage-rental-pricing","proceedingTitle":"United States v. RealPage rental-pricing matter","proceedingType":"court_case","proceedingSequence":2,"proceedingEventCount":2,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/realpage-rental-pricing","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-realpage","slug":"realpage-inc","name":"RealPage, Inc.","role":"remedy_subject"}]},{"id":"evt-google-search-remedies-2025","eventDate":"2025-09-02","year":2025,"title":"Court orders search distribution and data-access remedies","agency":"U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia","eventType":"remedy","stage":"remedy","summary":"The court prohibited specified exclusive distribution contracts and ordered access to certain search index and user-interaction data plus search and text-ad syndication services.","significance":"The official remedy record reaches search distribution, Chrome, and Gemini. Later market indicators should be monitored separately rather than treated as immediate proof of remedy effects.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-search","mkt-browser","mkt-ai-chatbot"],"sourceId":"doj-google-search-remedies-2025","docketNumber":null,"markets":[{"id":"mkt-search","slug":"us-search-engine-usage","name":"U.S. search engine usage","shortName":"Search engines"},{"id":"mkt-browser","slug":"us-browser-usage","name":"U.S. browser usage","shortName":"Browsers"},{"id":"mkt-ai-chatbot","slug":"us-ai-assistant-usage","name":"U.S. generative AI assistant usage","shortName":"AI assistants"}],"sourceTitle":"Department of Justice Wins Significant Remedies Against Google","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-wins-significant-remedies-against-google","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-google-search-remedies-2025","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/google-search-remedies-2025","proceedingId":"proceeding-google-search","proceedingSlug":"google-search-monopolization","proceedingTitle":"United States v. Google search monopolization","proceedingType":"court_case","proceedingSequence":3,"proceedingEventCount":3,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/google-search-monopolization","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-google-llc","slug":"google-llc","name":"Google LLC","role":"remedy_subject"}]},{"id":"evt-ai-partnerships-report-2025","eventDate":"2025-01-17","year":2025,"title":"FTC reports on cloud-provider and generative AI partnerships","agency":"Federal Trade Commission","eventType":"report","stage":"monitoring","summary":"The FTC published findings from its Section 6(b) study of investments and partnerships involving Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Anthropic, and OpenAI.","significance":"Adds upstream cloud, input-access, switching-cost, and information-sharing context to the AI usage-share profile; the report studies a broader competitive layer than chatbot usage.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-ai-chatbot"],"sourceId":"ftc-ai-partnerships-report-2025","docketNumber":null,"markets":[{"id":"mkt-ai-chatbot","slug":"us-ai-assistant-usage","name":"U.S. generative AI assistant usage","shortName":"AI assistants"}],"sourceTitle":"FTC Staff Report on AI Partnerships and Investments Study","sourcePublisher":"Federal Trade Commission","sourceUrl":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-issues-staff-report-ai-partnerships-investments-study","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/ftc-ai-partnerships-report-2025","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/ai-partnerships-report-2025","proceedingId":"proceeding-ai-partnerships-study","proceedingSlug":"generative-ai-partnerships-study","proceedingTitle":"FTC cloud and generative AI partnerships study","proceedingType":"market_study","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":1,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/generative-ai-partnerships-study","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-alphabet","slug":"alphabet-inc","name":"Alphabet, Inc.","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-amazon","slug":"amazon-com-inc","name":"Amazon.com, Inc.","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-anthropic","slug":"anthropic-pbc","name":"Anthropic PBC","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-microsoft","slug":"microsoft-corp","name":"Microsoft, Corp.","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-openai","slug":"openai-opco-llc","name":"OpenAI OpCo, LLC","role":"report_subject"}]},{"id":"evt-wireless-marketplace-report-2024","eventDate":"2024-12-31","year":2024,"title":"FCC releases 2024 Communications Marketplace Report","agency":"Federal Communications Commission","eventType":"report","stage":"monitoring","summary":"The FCC released its statutory competition assessment with mobile wireless indicators including nationwide HHI weighted by economic area for 2016 through 2023.","significance":"Provides the source-reported HHI anchors used by the wireless profile and a monitoring record for post-merger competitive conditions.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-wireless"],"sourceId":"fcc-2024-cmr","docketNumber":"GN Docket No. 24-119","markets":[{"id":"mkt-wireless","slug":"us-mobile-wireless-service","name":"U.S. mobile wireless service","shortName":"Wireless service"}],"sourceTitle":"2024 Communications Marketplace Report","sourcePublisher":"Federal Communications Commission","sourceUrl":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-136A1.pdf","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/fcc-2024-cmr","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/wireless-marketplace-report-2024","proceedingId":"proceeding-wireless-monitoring","proceedingSlug":"wireless-marketplace-monitoring","proceedingTitle":"FCC mobile wireless marketplace monitoring","proceedingType":"monitoring_series","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":1,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/wireless-marketplace-monitoring","namedEntities":[]},{"id":"evt-airlines-competition-inquiry-2024","eventDate":"2024-10-24","year":2024,"title":"DOJ and DOT launch broad inquiry into competition in air travel","agency":"U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Transportation","eventType":"inquiry","stage":"investigation","summary":"The agencies requested public information on consolidation, airport access, exclusionary conduct, ticket sales, pricing, rewards programs, labor, and other competition conditions in air travel.","significance":"Defines a public research agenda around the airline profile and identifies questions that cannot be answered by national carrier shares alone.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-airlines"],"sourceId":"doj-air-travel-inquiry-2024","docketNumber":null,"markets":[{"id":"mkt-airlines","slug":"us-airline-domestic-passengers","name":"U.S. domestic airline passengers","shortName":"Domestic airlines"}],"sourceTitle":"Justice Department and Department of Transportation Launch Broad Public Inquiry into Air Travel Competition","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Transportation","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-and-department-transportation-launch-broad-public-inquiry-state","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-air-travel-inquiry-2024","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/airlines-competition-inquiry-2024","proceedingId":"proceeding-air-travel-inquiry","proceedingSlug":"air-travel-competition-inquiry","proceedingTitle":"DOJ-DOT air travel competition inquiry","proceedingType":"market_inquiry","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":1,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/air-travel-competition-inquiry","namedEntities":[]},{"id":"evt-pbm-insulin-complaint-2024","eventDate":"2024-09-20","year":2024,"title":"FTC files administrative complaint against the three largest PBMs","agency":"Federal Trade Commission","eventType":"complaint","stage":"litigation","summary":"The FTC brought an administrative action alleging anticompetitive and unfair rebating and formulary practices involving Caremark, Express Scripts, OptumRx, and affiliated GPOs.","significance":"Adds alleged conduct and patient-harm context to the PBM profile. The allegations remain distinct from the descriptive concentration evidence and do not supply missing individual shares.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-pbm"],"sourceId":"ftc-pbm-insulin-complaint-2024","docketNumber":"Docket No. 9437","markets":[{"id":"mkt-pbm","slug":"us-pharmacy-benefit-management","name":"U.S. pharmacy benefit management","shortName":"PBMs"}],"sourceTitle":"FTC Sues Prescription Drug Middlemen for Artificially Inflating Insulin Drug Prices","sourcePublisher":"Federal Trade Commission","sourceUrl":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/09/ftc-sues-prescription-drug-middlemen-artificially-inflating-insulin-drug-prices","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/ftc-pbm-insulin-complaint-2024","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/pbm-insulin-complaint-2024","proceedingId":"proceeding-pbm-insulin","proceedingSlug":"pbm-insulin-rebate-case","proceedingTitle":"FTC insulin-rebate administrative matter","proceedingType":"administrative_case","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":3,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/pbm-insulin-rebate-case","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-ascent-health","slug":"ascent-health-services-llc","name":"Ascent Health Services, LLC","role":"respondent"},{"id":"pent-caremark-rx","slug":"caremark-rx-llc","name":"Caremark Rx, LLC","role":"respondent"},{"id":"pent-emisar-pharma","slug":"emisar-pharma-services-llc","name":"Emisar Pharma Services LLC","role":"respondent"},{"id":"pent-express-scripts","slug":"express-scripts-inc","name":"Express Scripts, Inc.","role":"respondent"},{"id":"pent-optumrx","slug":"optumrx-inc","name":"OptumRx, Inc.","role":"respondent"},{"id":"pent-zinc-health","slug":"zinc-health-services-llc","name":"Zinc Health Services, LLC","role":"respondent"}]},{"id":"evt-realpage-complaint-2024","eventDate":"2024-08-23","year":2024,"title":"DOJ and states sue RealPage over rental pricing practices","agency":"U.S. Department of Justice","eventType":"complaint","stage":"litigation","summary":"DOJ and state plaintiffs filed a civil antitrust complaint alleging unlawful information sharing and pricing coordination through RealPage revenue-management software.","significance":"Adds a conduct case to the rental housing evidence route without implying a national rental-market HHI; relevant competitive effects remain local and fact specific.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-housing"],"sourceId":"doj-realpage-case-2024","docketNumber":"1:24-cv-00710","markets":[{"id":"mkt-housing","slug":"us-rental-housing-access","name":"U.S. rental housing access","shortName":"Rental housing"}],"sourceTitle":"U.S. and Plaintiff States v. RealPage Inc.","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-and-plaintiff-states-v-realpage-inc","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-realpage-case-2024","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/realpage-complaint-2024","proceedingId":"proceeding-realpage","proceedingSlug":"realpage-rental-pricing","proceedingTitle":"United States v. RealPage rental-pricing matter","proceedingType":"court_case","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":2,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/realpage-rental-pricing","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-realpage","slug":"realpage-inc","name":"RealPage, Inc.","role":"defendant"}]},{"id":"evt-google-search-liability-2024","eventDate":"2024-08-05","year":2024,"title":"Court finds Google liable for unlawful search monopoly maintenance","agency":"U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia","eventType":"decision","stage":"decision","summary":"The district court issued a liability opinion finding that Google maintained monopolies in general search services and general search text advertising in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.","significance":"Marks the liability decision before the remedies phase. The ruling does not by itself establish a change in the observatory's usage-share HHI series.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-search","mkt-browser"],"sourceId":"doj-google-search-case-2020","docketNumber":null,"markets":[{"id":"mkt-search","slug":"us-search-engine-usage","name":"U.S. search engine usage","shortName":"Search engines"},{"id":"mkt-browser","slug":"us-browser-usage","name":"U.S. browser usage","shortName":"Browsers"}],"sourceTitle":"U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC [2020]","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-and-plaintiff-states-v-google-llc","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-google-search-case-2020","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/google-search-liability-2024","proceedingId":"proceeding-google-search","proceedingSlug":"google-search-monopolization","proceedingTitle":"United States v. Google search monopolization","proceedingType":"court_case","proceedingSequence":2,"proceedingEventCount":3,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/google-search-monopolization","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-google-llc","slug":"google-llc","name":"Google LLC","role":"defendant"}]},{"id":"evt-pbm-interim-report-2024","eventDate":"2024-07-09","year":2024,"title":"FTC releases interim staff report on prescription drug middlemen","agency":"Federal Trade Commission","eventType":"report","stage":"monitoring","summary":"The FTC published interim findings on PBM concentration and vertical integration, including aggregate shares for the largest PBMs.","significance":"Supplies top-three and top-six concentration facts while leaving individual firm shares unavailable; Antitrust Radar therefore continues to withhold HHI.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-pbm"],"sourceId":"ftc-pbm-interim-2024","docketNumber":null,"markets":[{"id":"mkt-pbm","slug":"us-pharmacy-benefit-management","name":"U.S. pharmacy benefit management","shortName":"PBMs"}],"sourceTitle":"Pharmacy Benefit Managers: The Powerful Middlemen Inflating Drug Costs and Squeezing Main Street Pharmacies","sourcePublisher":"Federal Trade Commission","sourceUrl":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/07/ftc-releases-interim-staff-report-prescription-drug-middlemen","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/ftc-pbm-interim-2024","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/pbm-interim-report-2024","proceedingId":"proceeding-pbm-study","proceedingSlug":"pharmacy-benefit-manager-study","proceedingTitle":"FTC pharmacy benefit manager market study","proceedingType":"market_study","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":1,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/pharmacy-benefit-manager-study","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-caremark-rx","slug":"caremark-rx-llc","name":"Caremark Rx, LLC","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-express-scripts","slug":"express-scripts-inc","name":"Express Scripts, Inc.","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-humana-pharmacy-solutions","slug":"humana-pharmacy-solutions-inc","name":"Humana Pharmacy Solutions, Inc.","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-medimpact","slug":"medimpact-healthcare-systems-inc","name":"MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-optumrx","slug":"optumrx-inc","name":"OptumRx, Inc.","role":"report_subject"},{"id":"pent-prime-therapeutics","slug":"prime-therapeutics-llc","name":"Prime Therapeutics LLC","role":"report_subject"}]},{"id":"evt-airlines-jetblue-spirit-decision-2024","eventDate":"2024-01-16","year":2024,"title":"Court blocks JetBlue's proposed acquisition of Spirit Airlines","agency":"U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts","eventType":"decision","stage":"decision","summary":"The district court blocked JetBlue's proposed acquisition of Spirit after a DOJ and state challenge under Section 7 of the Clayton Act.","significance":"Records a merger decision involving an ultra-low-cost rival. The current airline-share table remains a separate BTS market observation with its own definition and vintage.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-airlines"],"sourceId":"doj-jetblue-spirit-ruling-2024","docketNumber":"1:23-cv-10511","markets":[{"id":"mkt-airlines","slug":"us-airline-domestic-passengers","name":"U.S. domestic airline passengers","shortName":"Domestic airlines"}],"sourceTitle":"Justice Department Statements on Decision to Block JetBlue's Acquisition of Spirit Airlines","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-statements-district-court-decision-block-jetblues-acquisition-spirit","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-jetblue-spirit-ruling-2024","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/airlines-jetblue-spirit-decision-2024","proceedingId":"proceeding-jetblue-spirit","proceedingSlug":"jetblue-spirit-merger","proceedingTitle":"JetBlue-Spirit acquisition challenge","proceedingType":"merger_matter","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":1,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/jetblue-spirit-merger","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-jetblue-airways","slug":"jetblue-airways","name":"JetBlue Airways","role":"merging_party"},{"id":"pent-spirit-airlines","slug":"spirit-airlines","name":"Spirit Airlines","role":"merging_party"}]},{"id":"evt-google-search-complaint-2020","eventDate":"2020-10-20","year":2020,"title":"United States files search monopolization complaint against Google","agency":"U.S. Department of Justice","eventType":"complaint","stage":"litigation","summary":"DOJ and state plaintiffs filed a civil case challenging Google's maintenance of monopolies in general search services and search advertising through distribution agreements.","significance":"Starts the federal case chronology for the default and distribution channels connected to the search and browser profiles; it is legal context rather than a concentration observation.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-search","mkt-browser"],"sourceId":"doj-google-search-case-2020","docketNumber":null,"markets":[{"id":"mkt-search","slug":"us-search-engine-usage","name":"U.S. search engine usage","shortName":"Search engines"},{"id":"mkt-browser","slug":"us-browser-usage","name":"U.S. browser usage","shortName":"Browsers"}],"sourceTitle":"U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC [2020]","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-and-plaintiff-states-v-google-llc","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-google-search-case-2020","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/google-search-complaint-2020","proceedingId":"proceeding-google-search","proceedingSlug":"google-search-monopolization","proceedingTitle":"United States v. Google search monopolization","proceedingType":"court_case","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":3,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/google-search-monopolization","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-google-llc","slug":"google-llc","name":"Google LLC","role":"defendant"}]},{"id":"evt-wireless-merger-settlement-2019","eventDate":"2019-07-26","year":2019,"title":"T-Mobile-Sprint settlement requires divestitures to support wireless entry","agency":"U.S. Department of Justice","eventType":"settlement","stage":"remedy","summary":"DOJ and participating states filed a settlement requiring prepaid operations, spectrum, sites, and transitional network access to be made available to Dish as part of the T-Mobile-Sprint transaction.","significance":"Creates a policy anchor for the post-merger market structure. Later FCC HHI observations can be compared in time, but the observatory does not infer that the settlement caused a measured HHI change.","relatedMarketIds":["mkt-wireless"],"sourceId":"doj-tmobile-sprint-settlement-2019","docketNumber":"1:19-cv-02232","markets":[{"id":"mkt-wireless","slug":"us-mobile-wireless-service","name":"U.S. mobile wireless service","shortName":"Wireless service"}],"sourceTitle":"Justice Department Settles with T-Mobile and Sprint in Their Proposed Merger","sourcePublisher":"U.S. Department of Justice","sourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-settles-t-mobile-and-sprint-their-proposed-merger-requiring-package","sourceProfileHref":"/sources/doj-tmobile-sprint-settlement-2019","recordProfileHref":"/enforcement/records/wireless-merger-settlement-2019","proceedingId":"proceeding-tmobile-sprint","proceedingSlug":"tmobile-sprint-merger","proceedingTitle":"T-Mobile-Sprint merger and divestiture remedy","proceedingType":"merger_matter","proceedingSequence":1,"proceedingEventCount":1,"proceedingProfileHref":"/enforcement/proceedings/tmobile-sprint-merger","namedEntities":[{"id":"pent-dish-network","slug":"dish-network","name":"DISH Network Corp.","role":"divestiture_recipient"},{"id":"pent-sprint","slug":"sprint-corporation","name":"Sprint Corporation","role":"merging_party"},{"id":"pent-tmobile-us","slug":"t-mobile-us","name":"T-Mobile US Inc.","role":"merging_party"}]}]}