{"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","dataset":"atlas","mode":"comparison","updatedThrough":"2026-08-15","guardrail":"A bilateral atlas route preserves a sequence of declared edges for navigation and audit. A direct edge, common neighbor, or multi-hop path does not make the endpoints equivalent, establish ownership or control, assign liability, define an antitrust market, make unlike measures comparable, or show causation.","filters":{"layer":"all","layerMatched":true,"left":"topic:geographic-competition","leftMatched":true,"right":"issue:food-buyer-power","rightMatched":true,"view":"paths"},"summary":{"nodeCount":5478,"edgeCount":19193,"sourceCount":0,"profileCount":5433,"nodeKindCount":13,"layerCount":4,"directEdgeCount":1,"disconnected":false,"eligibleEdgeCount":19193,"ledgerEdgeCount":1,"leftNeighborCount":17,"pathLimitReached":false,"rightNeighborCount":4,"sharedNeighborCount":0,"shortestHopCount":1,"shortestPathCount":1},"endpoints":{"left":{"id":"topic:geographic-competition","kind":"topic","label":"Geographic Competition","shortLabel":"Geographic Competition","description":"How does competitive structure vary across national, state, county, tract, route, and other local frames?","href":"/research/topics/geographic-competition","metricLabel":"Publication memberships","metricValue":"7","detail":"AR-T04 / 4 issue programs / 5 evidence lanes","status":"institutional research topic","year":2026,"color":"#ea580c","searchText":"ar-t04 geographic competition places how does competitive structure vary across national, state, county, tract, route, and other local frames? connect place-based concentration screens to their exact geography, source vintage, ownership rules, and local-market research needs. a statewide, county, tract, or national screen does not establish a legal geographic market. medians of local hhis are not interchangeable with one national hhi. area-level shares and distributions, ownership and entry histories, local prices and quality, commuting or procurement patterns, capacity, switching, and stable geographic definitions. local officials, researchers, journalists, and community advocates ar-sc-2026-01 the u.s. competition landscape ar-dn-2026-02 housing competition needs local ownership data ar-rb-2026-03 state banking structure, 2015-2025 ar-rb-2026-06 fixed broadband concentration across geographic scales, 2020-2024 ar-rb-2026-07 state individual insurance concentration, 2024 ar-ci-2026-04 geographic concentration screens point in different directions at different scales. ar-ci-2026-05 national fixed-broadband hhi rose while three geographic medians fell.","connectionCount":17},"right":{"id":"issue:food-buyer-power","kind":"issue","label":"Food systems and buyer power","shortLabel":"Food buyer power","description":"How does buyer concentration in regional cattle procurement affect producer options, contract terms, and supply-chain resilience?","href":"/issues/food-systems-and-buyer-power","metricLabel":"Bounded markets","metricValue":"1","detail":"1 separately defined market / editorial research program","status":"issue program","year":2019,"color":"#c026d3","searchText":"food systems and buyer power food buyer power procurement options, regional boundaries, and resilience the program follows the usda national beef-packer cr4 series into a buyer-power research frame while preserving the need for regional procurement markets and firm-level evidence. how does buyer concentration in regional cattle procurement affect producer options, contract terms, and supply-chain resilience? which plant-level purchases, procurement distances, capacity, contracts, and prices define regional buyer alternatives? how do entry, exit, outages, captive supply, and transportation costs change producer bargaining options? which firm-level records can disaggregate the national cr4 without inferring equal shares among the four largest buyers? u.s. steer and heifer purchases by beef packers beef meatpacking food and agriculture","connectionCount":4}},"shortestPaths":[{"id":"path:topic-issue:geographic-competition:food-buyer-power","edges":[{"id":"topic-issue:geographic-competition:food-buyer-power","type":"topic_issue","layer":"research","from":"topic:geographic-competition","to":"issue:food-buyer-power","label":"Declared issue-program membership","detail":"Food systems and buyer power is explicitly included in the Geographic Competition institutional research contract.","evidenceLabel":"Research topic issue contract","sourceId":null,"sourceUrl":null,"confidenceLevel":"bounded","guardrail":"A topic-to-issue link records one declared institutional membership. It does not merge the issue program's markets, establish harm, rank importance, or imply a shared method or finding."}],"hopCount":1,"nodes":[{"id":"topic:geographic-competition","kind":"topic","label":"Geographic Competition","shortLabel":"Geographic Competition","description":"How does competitive structure vary across national, state, county, tract, route, and other local frames?","href":"/research/topics/geographic-competition","metricLabel":"Publication memberships","metricValue":"7","detail":"AR-T04 / 4 issue programs / 5 evidence lanes","status":"institutional research topic","year":2026,"color":"#ea580c","searchText":"ar-t04 geographic competition places how does competitive structure vary across national, state, county, tract, route, and other local frames? connect place-based concentration screens to their exact geography, source vintage, ownership rules, and local-market research needs. a statewide, county, tract, or national screen does not establish a legal geographic market. medians of local hhis are not interchangeable with one national hhi. area-level shares and distributions, ownership and entry histories, local prices and quality, commuting or procurement patterns, capacity, switching, and stable geographic definitions. local officials, researchers, journalists, and community advocates ar-sc-2026-01 the u.s. competition landscape ar-dn-2026-02 housing competition needs local ownership data ar-rb-2026-03 state banking structure, 2015-2025 ar-rb-2026-06 fixed broadband concentration across geographic scales, 2020-2024 ar-rb-2026-07 state individual insurance concentration, 2024 ar-ci-2026-04 geographic concentration screens point in different directions at different scales. ar-ci-2026-05 national fixed-broadband hhi rose while three geographic medians fell.","connectionCount":17},{"id":"issue:food-buyer-power","kind":"issue","label":"Food systems and buyer power","shortLabel":"Food buyer power","description":"How does buyer concentration in regional cattle procurement affect producer options, contract terms, and supply-chain resilience?","href":"/issues/food-systems-and-buyer-power","metricLabel":"Bounded markets","metricValue":"1","detail":"1 separately defined market / editorial research program","status":"issue program","year":2019,"color":"#c026d3","searchText":"food systems and buyer power food buyer power procurement options, regional boundaries, and resilience the program follows the usda national beef-packer cr4 series into a buyer-power research frame while preserving the need for regional procurement markets and firm-level evidence. how does buyer concentration in regional cattle procurement affect producer options, contract terms, and supply-chain resilience? which plant-level purchases, procurement distances, capacity, contracts, and prices define regional buyer alternatives? how do entry, exit, outages, captive supply, and transportation costs change producer bargaining options? which firm-level records can disaggregate the national cr4 without inferring equal shares among the four largest buyers? u.s. steer and heifer purchases by beef packers beef meatpacking food and agriculture","connectionCount":4}]}],"sharedNeighbors":[],"nodes":[{"id":"issue:food-buyer-power","kind":"issue","label":"Food systems and buyer power","shortLabel":"Food buyer power","description":"How does buyer concentration in regional cattle procurement affect producer options, contract terms, and supply-chain resilience?","href":"/issues/food-systems-and-buyer-power","metricLabel":"Bounded markets","metricValue":"1","detail":"1 separately defined market / editorial research program","status":"issue program","year":2019,"color":"#c026d3","searchText":"food systems and buyer power food buyer power procurement options, regional boundaries, and resilience the program follows the usda national beef-packer cr4 series into a buyer-power research frame while preserving the need for regional procurement markets and firm-level evidence. how does buyer concentration in regional cattle procurement affect producer options, contract terms, and supply-chain resilience? which plant-level purchases, procurement distances, capacity, contracts, and prices define regional buyer alternatives? how do entry, exit, outages, captive supply, and transportation costs change producer bargaining options? which firm-level records can disaggregate the national cr4 without inferring equal shares among the four largest buyers? u.s. steer and heifer purchases by beef packers beef meatpacking food and agriculture","connectionCount":4},{"id":"topic:geographic-competition","kind":"topic","label":"Geographic Competition","shortLabel":"Geographic Competition","description":"How does competitive structure vary across national, state, county, tract, route, and other local frames?","href":"/research/topics/geographic-competition","metricLabel":"Publication memberships","metricValue":"7","detail":"AR-T04 / 4 issue programs / 5 evidence lanes","status":"institutional research topic","year":2026,"color":"#ea580c","searchText":"ar-t04 geographic competition places how does competitive structure vary across national, state, county, tract, route, and other local frames? connect place-based concentration screens to their exact geography, source vintage, ownership rules, and local-market research needs. a statewide, county, tract, or national screen does not establish a legal geographic market. medians of local hhis are not interchangeable with one national hhi. area-level shares and distributions, ownership and entry histories, local prices and quality, commuting or procurement patterns, capacity, switching, and stable geographic definitions. local officials, researchers, journalists, and community advocates ar-sc-2026-01 the u.s. competition landscape ar-dn-2026-02 housing competition needs local ownership data ar-rb-2026-03 state banking structure, 2015-2025 ar-rb-2026-06 fixed broadband concentration across geographic scales, 2020-2024 ar-rb-2026-07 state individual insurance concentration, 2024 ar-ci-2026-04 geographic concentration screens point in different directions at different scales. ar-ci-2026-05 national fixed-broadband hhi rose while three geographic medians fell.","connectionCount":17}],"rows":[{"id":"topic-issue:geographic-competition:food-buyer-power","layer":"research","relationshipType":"topic_issue","relationshipLabel":"Declared issue-program membership","fromId":"topic:geographic-competition","fromKind":"topic","fromLabel":"Geographic Competition","fromHref":"/research/topics/geographic-competition","toId":"issue:food-buyer-power","toKind":"issue","toLabel":"Food systems and buyer power","toHref":"/issues/food-systems-and-buyer-power","evidenceLabel":"Research topic issue contract","evidenceDetail":"Food systems and buyer power is explicitly included in the Geographic Competition institutional research contract.","sourceId":null,"sourceUrl":null,"confidenceLevel":"bounded","indicatorId":null,"entityCode":null,"observationCount":null,"firstYear":null,"latestYear":null,"preferredView":null,"sourceIds":null,"guardrail":"A topic-to-issue link records one declared institutional membership. It does not merge the issue program's markets, establish harm, rank importance, or imply a shared method or finding."}]}